These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2023999)

  • 1. Intravascular contrast media. Ionic versus nonionic: current status.
    McClennan BL; Stolberg HO
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1991 May; 29(3):437-54. PubMed ID: 2023999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preston M. Hickey memorial lecture. Ionic and nonionic iodinated contrast media: evolution and strategies for use.
    McClennan BL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Aug; 155(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 2115244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative tolerability of contrast media used for coronary interventions.
    Esplugas E; Cequier A; Gomez-Hospital JA; Del Blanco BG; Jara F
    Drug Saf; 2002; 25(15):1079-98. PubMed ID: 12452733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media: a prospective study of the effect of rapid bolus injection on nausea and anaphylactoid reactions.
    Federle MP; Willis LL; Swanson DP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 9606371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-osmolality contrast media: premises and promises.
    McClennan BL
    Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3786748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adverse events and cost savings three years after implementation of guidelines for outpatient contrast-agent use.
    Grant KL; Camamo JM
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1997 Jun; 54(12):1395-401. PubMed ID: 9194983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The clotting issue: etiologic factors in thromboembolism. I. Chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicity of angiographic contrast agents.
    Dawson P
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S25-30. PubMed ID: 8282499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wangsuphachart S
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1991 Dec; 22(4):664-76. PubMed ID: 1820658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The effects of contrast media on the cardiac conducting system in coronary angiography].
    Kawamori J
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Nov; 49(11):1372-81. PubMed ID: 2602100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-osmolality contrast media: a current perspective.
    King BF; Hartman GW; Williamson B; LeRoy AJ; Hattery RR
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1989 Aug; 64(8):976-85. PubMed ID: 2677533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Profound platelet degranulation is an important side effect of some types of contrast media used in interventional cardiology.
    Chronos NA; Goodall AH; Wilson DJ; Sigwart U; Buller NP
    Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):2035-44. PubMed ID: 8222096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nephrotoxicity of contrast media following cardiac angiography: pathogenesis, clinical course, and preventive measures, including the role of low-osmolality contrast media.
    Spinler SA; Goldfarb S
    Ann Pharmacother; 1992 Jan; 26(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 1606346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The safety and cost-effectiveness of low osmolar contrast media. Can economic analysis determine the real worth of a new technology?
    Henry DA; Evans DB; Robertson J
    Med J Aust; 1991 Jun; 154(11):766-72. PubMed ID: 1828529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ionic versus nonionic contrast use.
    Stolberg HO; McClennan BL
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 1991; 20(2):47-88. PubMed ID: 2049958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of high- and low-osmolality contrast media on renal function in children].
    Chen CY; Cao L; Chen DK; Chu M; Tu J
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 44(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 16780650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast media in computed tomography.
    Valls C; Andía E; Sánchez A; Moreno V
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Aug; 13(8):2000-5. PubMed ID: 12942301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast-induced nephropathy: are there differences between low osmolar and iso-osmolar iodinated contrast media?
    Morcos SK
    Clin Radiol; 2009 May; 64(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 19348841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of low-osmolar agents and premedication to reduce the frequency of adverse reactions to radiographic contrast media: a survey of the Society of Uroradiology.
    Cohan RH; Ellis JH; Dunnick NR
    Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):357-64. PubMed ID: 7824710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deaths related to iodinated contrast media reported spontaneously to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1978-1994: effect of the availability of low-osmolality contrast media.
    Spring DB; Bettmann MA; Barkan HE
    Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 9240516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of nonionic contrast agents in neuroangiography. A review of the literature and recommendations for clinical use.
    Latchaw RE
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S55-9; discussion S60-1. PubMed ID: 8282504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.