These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2024012)
21. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Failure to determine breech position: M.D. or R.N. duty? Case in point: Alvis v. Henderson Obstetrics, S.C. (592 N.E.2d 678--[1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):4. PubMed ID: 1410395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Court case of nursing malpractice--midwife's failure to monitor on the machine the fetal heart beat which caused cerebral palsy of the newborn]. Fukaya Y Kango; 1995 Jul; 47(9):147-53. PubMed ID: 8716731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The obstetrical dilemma. Avery JK J Ark Med Soc; 2005 Dec; 102(6):156-7. PubMed ID: 16381401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Changing indications for cesarean section. A 38-year experience at a community hospital. Haddad H; Lundy LE Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Feb; 51(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 622222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The vexed issue of cerebral palsy and breech presentation. Badawi N; Keogh JM Dev Med Child Neurol; 2009 Nov; 51(11):846. PubMed ID: 19549195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [External version of breech presentation--a possibility for lowering the rate of cesarean section and infant morbidity]. Köppel R; Benz J Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1986 Oct; 46(10):710-4. PubMed ID: 3542691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Delivery by caesarean section. Longer term follow up of surviving babies is required. Pharoah PO; Platt MJ BMJ; 2001 Oct; 323(7318):933-4. PubMed ID: 11693138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Cesarean section in the primigravid. Mesleh RA; Asiri F; Al-Naim MF Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct; 21(10):957-9. PubMed ID: 11369962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Are nurses held to same standards of care as physicians? Case in point: Alef v. Alta Bates Hospital (6 Cal Rptr. 2d 900-CA [1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jun; 33(1):4. PubMed ID: 1626055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Misuse of fetal monitor: brain damage results. Case in point: McGee v. Corometrics Medical Systems, Inc. (487 So. 2d 886-AL). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Jul; 27(2):4. PubMed ID: 3637905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. "Substantial evidence" criteria needed to uphold verdict on appeal. Case in point: Silvis through Silvis v. Hobbs (824 P 2d. 1013--MT (1992)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Apr; 32(11):4. PubMed ID: 1603937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Medical liability in the delayed use of cesarean section]. Schlund GH Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1984 Sep; 44(9):591-2. PubMed ID: 6567562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Failure to "fully communicate": catastrophic results. Case in point: Baptist Medical Center v. Wilson 618 So. 2d 1335--AL (1993). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Aug; 34(3):2. PubMed ID: 8198619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Legal briefs for nurses. PA: expert testimony on care standard--OK: testimony on causation & diagnosis--NG; MO: failure to recognize complications: admissibility of nursing staff meeting minutes. Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Dec; 36(7):3. PubMed ID: 8685373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Hindsight--20/20. Avery JK J Ark Med Soc; 1997 Nov; 94(6):267. PubMed ID: 9392929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Caesarean childbirth. Summary of an NIH consensus statement. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 May; 282(6276):1600-4. PubMed ID: 6786581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]