These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2025622)

  • 1. Proportional analysis of the facial profile in natural head position in Caucasian and Chinese children.
    Lundström A; Cooke MS
    Br J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 18(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 2025622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 20709723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of southern Chinese and British Caucasian cephalometric standards.
    Cooke MS; Wei SH
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 2729666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for the Lambada population in Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh.
    Thomas M; Reddy VD; Lakshmi HV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 23059572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in dentofacial characteristics between southern versus northern Chinese adolescents.
    Gu Y; Hagg U; Wu J; Yeung S
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 22372272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Croatians using of linear measurements.
    Milosević SA; Varga ML; Slaj M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):251-8. PubMed ID: 18216697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soft tissue cephalometric norms for a North Indian population group using Legan and Burstone analysis.
    Jain P; Kalra JP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 20965694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics of proportional analysis for soft tissue facial profile: epidemiological possibilities of measurement item reduction.
    Kishi S
    J Oral Sci; 1999 Sep; 41(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 10692835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
    Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Size and shape of soft-tissue facial profile: effects of age, gender, and skeletal class.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 9431467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis.
    Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of facial morphologies between adult Chinese and Houstonian Caucasian populations using three-dimensional imaging.
    Wirthlin J; Kau CH; English JD; Pan F; Zhou H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1100-7. PubMed ID: 23623784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mandibular setback osteotomy: facial soft tissue behavior and possibility to improve the accuracy of the soft tissue profile prediction with the use of a computerized cephalometric program: Quick Ceph Image Pro: v. 2.5.
    Chunmaneechote P; Friede H
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 May; 2(2):85-98. PubMed ID: 10534984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vertical photogrammetric evaluation of the soft tissue profiles of two different racial groups: a comparative study.
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Fadiga MS; Badiane A; Diop-Ba K; Ndiaye M; Diagne F
    Int Orthod; 2014 Dec; 12(4):443-57. PubMed ID: 25457394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric norms for the Chinese: a compilation of existing data.
    Moate SJ; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2002 Mar; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 12502125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Chinese and white Bolton standards at age 13.
    Zhao XG; Hans MG; Palomo JM; Lin JX
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Sep; 83(5):809-16. PubMed ID: 23368780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile.
    Fernández-Riveiro P; Smyth-Chamosa E; Suárez-Quintanilla D; Suárez-Cunqueiro M
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Aug; 25(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 12938846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.