130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2025777)
1. Patient dose and risk in mammography.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1991 Apr; 64(760):360-5. PubMed ID: 2025777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A pilot survey of radiation doses received in the United Kingdom Breast Screening Programme.
Burch A; Goodman DA
Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):517-27. PubMed ID: 9691897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the population dose to the UK population from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme.
Faulkner K; Wallis MG; Neilson F; Whitaker CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):184-90. PubMed ID: 18483008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening.
Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 21081671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast dose from magnification films in mammography.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 2005 Sep; 78(933):816-20. PubMed ID: 16110103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998.
Young KC; Burch A
Br J Radiol; 2000 Mar; 73(867):278-87. PubMed ID: 10817044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cancers detected and induced in mammographic screening: new screening schedules and younger women with family history.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Jan; 70():62-9. PubMed ID: 9059297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation risk of mammography related to benefit in screening programmes: a favourable balance?
Beemsterboer PM; Warmerdam PG; Boer R; de Koning HJ
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 9718526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation dose and risk in screening mammography.
Adcock DF; Howe DB
J Med Syst; 1994 Aug; 18(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 7829978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography-oncogenecity at low doses.
Heyes GJ; Mill AJ; Charles MW
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A123-32. PubMed ID: 19454801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variations in individual radiation dose in a breast screening programme and consequences for the balance between associated risk and benefit.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):691-8. PubMed ID: 7719682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk factors for induction of breast cancer by X-rays and their implications for breast screening.
Law J; Faulkner K; Young KC
Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):261-6. PubMed ID: 17038413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme.
Heyes GJ; Mill AJ; Charles MW
Br J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 79(939):195-200. PubMed ID: 16498030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Cancer Induced by X-Ray Mammography Screening? A Review Based on Recent Understanding of Low-Dose Radiobiology.
Pauwels EK; Foray N; Bourguignon MH
Med Princ Pract; 2016; 25(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 26571215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk- and cost-benefit analyses of breast screening programs derived from absorbed dose measurements in The Netherlands.
Zuur C; Broerse JJ
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):211-22. PubMed ID: 3928229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Study of radiation induced cancers in a breast screening programme.
León A; Verdú G; Cuevas MD; Salas MD; Villaescusa JI; Bueno F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 93(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 11548322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glandularity and mean glandular dose determined for individual women at four regional breast cancer screening units in the Netherlands.
Zoetelief J; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; Jansen JT
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(7):1807-17. PubMed ID: 16552106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Mammography and radiation risk].
Jung H
Rofo; 1998 Oct; 169(4):336-43. PubMed ID: 9819644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of mean glandular dose in mammography.
Faulkner K; Law J; Robson KJ
Br J Radiol; 1995 Aug; 68(812):877-81. PubMed ID: 7551786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Absorbed radiation dose in mammography.
Hammerstein GR; Miller DW; White DR; Masterson ME; Woodard HQ; Laughlin JS
Radiology; 1979 Feb; 130(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 760167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
