These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2025777)

  • 61. A new method for assessment of radiation risk from screening mammography.
    Feig SA
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1990; 119():141-50. PubMed ID: 2236855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Assessment of usefulness and risk of mammography screening with exclusive attention to radiation risk].
    Jung H
    Radiologe; 2001 Apr; 41(4):385-95. PubMed ID: 11388061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Absorbed dose in xeromammography.
    Zárand P; Péntek Z
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Feb; 53(626):114-9. PubMed ID: 7370491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Prediction of glandularity and breast radiation dose from mammography results in Japanese women.
    Yamamuro M; Asai Y; Yamada K; Ozaki Y; Matsumoto M; Murakami T
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jan; 57(1):289-298. PubMed ID: 30099671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A method for minimizing the radiation exposure from scoliosis radiographs.
    De Smet AA; Fritz SL; Asher MA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1981 Jan; 63(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 7451519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Estimation of compressed breast thickness during mammography.
    Highnam RP; Brady JM; Shepstone BJ
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Jun; 71(846):646-53. PubMed ID: 9849389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Cancer of the breast--induction by radiation and role of mammography.
    Simon N
    Rev Interam Radiol; 1977 Oct; 2(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 145649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A method for estimating compressed breast thickness during mammography.
    Burch A; Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Apr; 68(808):394-9. PubMed ID: 7795976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Mammography--use or abuse.
    Ilbery PL
    Aust Fam Physician; 1979 Jun; 8(6):615-6, 619-20, 623-8. PubMed ID: 464914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Relative carcinogenic effects of different mammography techniques.
    Muntz EP
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 470843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Screening mammography. A risk versus risk decision.
    Ritenour ER; Hendee WR
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jan; 24(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 2645240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Mammogram myths and facts. The truth about breast cancer screening.
    Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource; 2005 Jun; 9(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 15888994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Multiple fluoroscopy of the chest: carcinogenicity for the female breast and implications for breast cancer screening programs.
    Delarue NC; Gale G; Ronald A
    Can Med Assoc J; 1975 Jun; 112(12):1405-13. PubMed ID: 1139485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Hypothetical breast cancer risk from mammography.
    Feig SA
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1984; 90():1-10. PubMed ID: 6366947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Radiation exposure of the breast in film- and xero-mammography.
    Säbel M; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
    Strahlentherapie; 1976 Jun; 151(6):504-10. PubMed ID: 936250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Exposure to low-dose radiation and the risk of breast cancer among women with a familial or genetic predisposition: a meta-analysis.
    Jansen-van der Weide MC; Greuter MJ; Jansen L; Oosterwijk JC; Pijnappel RM; de Bock GH
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Nov; 20(11):2547-56. PubMed ID: 20582702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Reduced-dose magnification mammography.
    Bassett LW; Arnold BA; Borger D; Eisenberg HC; Gold RH; Mahn GR; Holland WP
    Radiology; 1981 Dec; 141(3):665-70. PubMed ID: 7302220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Risk versus benefit in mammography.
    Lester RG
    Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 866625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Comment on "Mammography-oncogenecity at low doses".
    Mitchel RE; Redpath JL
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):457-9. PubMed ID: 19810287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Can animal and in vitro studies give new, relevant answers to questions concerning mammorgraphic screening for human breast cancer?
    Dethlefsen LA; Brown JM; Carrano AV; Nandi S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1978 Dec; 61(6):1537-45. PubMed ID: 281563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.