These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2025911)

  • 1. Three-dimensional digitization: method for evaluating morphological differences between teeth.
    Soma K; Kuroki T; Nakamura T; Miura F
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1991 Mar; 38(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 2025911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of Bolton tooth-size ratios by digitization, and comparison with the traditional method.
    Paredes V; Gandia JL; Cibrian R
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 16373454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Three dimensional shape measurement of teeth (3). The divisional measurement method of abutment teeth].
    Kimura H; Sohmura T; Watanabe T
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Jul; 8(4):551-8. PubMed ID: 2491166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reconstruction of three-dimensional digital teeth.
    Han K; Lu RQ; Ma YH; Lu PJ; Zhang H; Wang WB
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Sep; 1(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 10557190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examination of Bolton Index comparing the traditional method with a 2-dimensional digital measurement method.
    Roşu S; Zetu I; Ogodescu A; Veiszenbacher E; Mártha KI
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014; 118(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 24741801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new mathematical process for the calculation of average forms of teeth.
    Mehl A; Blanz V; Hickel R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):561-6. PubMed ID: 16316803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The comparison analysis of the line measurements between plaster and virtual orthodontic 3D models].
    Jedlińska A
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 19374240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression.
    Luthardt RG; Loos R; Quaas S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Oct; 8(4):283-94. PubMed ID: 16689029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the augmented reproducibility in measurements on 3D orthodontic digital dental models and the definition of feature points.
    Jacquet W; Nyssen E; Ibel G; Vannet BV
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 23785935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
    Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gingival volume measurement through the analysis of tooth crown area: a digital and computed method.
    Rodrigues GG; Madureira DF; Lages EM; Lages EJ; Pretti H
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Oct; 32(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 22754906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The research and development of noncontact 3-D laser dental model measuring and analyzing system.
    Lu P; Li Z; Wang Y; Chen J; Zhao J
    Chin J Dent Res; 2000 Nov; 3(3):7-14. PubMed ID: 11314539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New, fast, and accurate procedure to calibrate a 2-dimensional digital measurement method.
    Paredes V; Gandia JL; Cibrian R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):518-9. PubMed ID: 15821697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins.
    Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):575-84. PubMed ID: 11404758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Development of the dental CAD/CAM system].
    Kawanaka M
    Osaka Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1990 Jun; 35(1):206-39. PubMed ID: 2135405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions.
    Elcock C; Smith RN; Simpson J; Abdellatif A; Bäckman B; Brook AH
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 May; 114 Suppl 1():365-9; discussion 375-6, 382-3. PubMed ID: 16674714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Three-dimensional shape measurement of teeth. (6) Measurement of tooth model by tilting method by means of the double sensor laser displacement meter, and the simulation of occlusion].
    Kimura H; Sohmura T; Watanabe T
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Jul; 9(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 2134833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer copings for partial coverage.
    Denissen H; van der Zel J; Reisig J; Vlaar S; de Ruiter W; van Waas R
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Apr; 2(2):113-27. PubMed ID: 11351490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.