BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2026193)

  • 1. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position.
    Paulignan Y; MacKenzie C; Marteniuk R; Jeannerod M
    Exp Brain Res; 1991; 83(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 2026193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size.
    Paulignan Y; Jeannerod M; MacKenzie C; Marteniuk R
    Exp Brain Res; 1991; 87(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 1769391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: a kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects.
    Gentilucci M; Toni I; Chieffi S; Pavesi G
    Exp Brain Res; 1994; 99(3):483-500. PubMed ID: 7957728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analysis of spatiotemporal variability during prehension movements: effects of object size and distance.
    Kudoh N; Hattori M; Numata N; Maruyama K
    Exp Brain Res; 1997 Dec; 117(3):457-64. PubMed ID: 9438714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coordination between the transport and the grasp components during prehension movements.
    Chieffi S; Gentilucci M
    Exp Brain Res; 1993; 94(3):471-7. PubMed ID: 8359261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements.
    Desmurget M; Prablanc C; Arzi M; Rossetti Y; Paulignan Y; Urquizar C
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Jul; 110(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 8836690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements.
    Paulignan Y; Frak VG; Toni I; Jeannerod M
    Exp Brain Res; 1997 Apr; 114(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 9166912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation.
    Gentilucci M; Chieffi S; Scarpa M; Castiello U
    Behav Brain Res; 1992 Mar; 47(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 1571102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is object texture a constraint on human prehension?: kinematic evidence.
    Weir PL; MacKenzie CL; Marteniuk RG; Cargoe SL
    J Mot Behav; 1991 Sep; 23(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 14766517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension.
    Paulignan Y; MacKenzie C; Marteniuk R; Jeannerod M
    Exp Brain Res; 1990; 79(2):431-5. PubMed ID: 2323388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prehension movements directed to approaching objects: influence of stimulus velocity on the transport and the grasp components.
    Chieffi S; Fogassi L; Gallese V; Gentilucci M
    Neuropsychologia; 1992 Oct; 30(10):877-97. PubMed ID: 1436435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Online kinematic regulation by visual feedback for grasp versus transport during reach-to-pinch.
    Nataraj R; Pasluosta C; Li ZM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Aug; 36():134-53. PubMed ID: 24968371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of object weight on the kinematics of prehension.
    Weir PL; MacKenzie CL; Marteniuk RG; Cargoe SL; Frazer MB
    J Mot Behav; 1991 Sep; 23(3):192-204. PubMed ID: 14766516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coordination of pincer grasp and transport after mechanical perturbation of the index finger.
    Schettino LF; Adamovich SV; Tunik E
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jun; 117(6):2292-2297. PubMed ID: 28331008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coordination and control of bimanual prehension: effects of perturbing object location.
    Mason AH
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 188(1):125-39. PubMed ID: 18357442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements.
    Stelmach GE; Castiello U; Jeannerod M
    J Mot Behav; 1994 Jun; 26(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 15753070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tactile input of the hand and the control of reaching to grasp movements.
    Gentilucci M; Toni I; Daprati E; Gangitano M
    Exp Brain Res; 1997 Mar; 114(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 9125458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size.
    Castiello U; Bennett KM; Stelmach GE
    Exp Brain Res; 1993; 94(1):163-78. PubMed ID: 8335072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping.
    Schettino LF; Adamovich SV; Poizner H
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jul; 151(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 12783144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.