These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2026286)

  • 1. Comparison of three hearing aid fittings using the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) Test.
    Surr RK; Fabry DA
    Ear Hear; 1991 Feb; 12(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 2026286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the speech intelligibility rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons.
    McDaniel DM; Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):686-93. PubMed ID: 1608261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of in-the-ear and over-the-ear hearing aid fittings.
    Cox RM; Risberg DM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 Nov; 51(4):362-9. PubMed ID: 3773492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons.
    Cox RM; McDaniel DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 2739387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preference judgments of artificial processed and hearing-aid transduced speech.
    Versfeld NJ; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Sep; 106(3 Pt 1):1566-78. PubMed ID: 10489712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preferred insertion gain of hearing aids in listening and reading-aloud situations.
    Kuk FK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Sep; 33(3):520-9. PubMed ID: 2232770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of frequency lowering algorithms for getting the highest speech intelligibility improvement by hearing loss simulation.
    Arıöz U; Günel B
    J Med Syst; 2015 Jun; 39(6):64. PubMed ID: 25894599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Syllabic compression and speech intelligibility in hearing impaired listeners.
    Verschuure J; Dreschler WA; de Haan EH; van Cappellen M; Hammerschlag R; Maré MJ; Maas AJ; Hijmans AC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():92-100. PubMed ID: 8153570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intelligibility ratings of continuous discourse: application to hearing aid selection.
    Cox RM; McDaniel DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Sep; 76(3):758-66. PubMed ID: 6491048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability, sensitivity and validity of magnitude estimation, category scaling and paired-comparison judgements of speech intelligibility by older listeners.
    Purdy SC; Pavlovic CV
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):254-71. PubMed ID: 1482505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Damping the hearing aid frequency response: effects on speech clarity and preferred listening level.
    Cox RM; Gilmore C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 3762099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of hearing aids on speech perception in noisy situations.
    Verschuure J; van Benthem PP
    Audiology; 1992; 31(4):205-21. PubMed ID: 1444932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of objective and subjective measures of speech intelligibility in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Rivera IM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Aug; 34(4):904-15. PubMed ID: 1956197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Kluk K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1133-44. PubMed ID: 12243160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of an articulation-index based model for predicting the effects of adaptive frequency response hearing aids.
    Fabry DA; Van Tasell DJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 33(4):676-89. PubMed ID: 2273883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic versus electronic modifications of hearing aid low-frequency output.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 6618038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The development of auditory performance and speech intelligibility at the early stage after hearing aid fitting in children with moderate or severe hearing loss].
    Jing LV; Chen X; Zhang H; Li J; Wu Y; Wang S; Kong Y; Liu B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 27(22):1234-8. PubMed ID: 24616979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise after hearing aid fitting according to a purely prescriptive and a comparative fitting procedure.
    Metselaar M; Maat B; Krijnen P; Verschuure H; Dreschler W; Feenstra L
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 265(9):1113-20. PubMed ID: 18246361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.