BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2026634)

  • 1. Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet.
    Czerniecki JM; Gitter A; Munro C
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 2026634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below-knee amputee walking.
    Gitter A; Czerniecki JM; DeGroot DM
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1991 Jun; 70(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 2039616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamics of below-knee child amputee gait: SACH foot versus Flex foot.
    Schneider K; Hart T; Zernicke RF; Setoguchi Y; Oppenheim W
    J Biomech; 1993 Oct; 26(10):1191-204. PubMed ID: 8253824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of mechanical and metabolic factors in the gait of congenital below knee amputees. A comparison of the SACH and Seattle feet.
    Colborne GR; Naumann S; Longmuir PE; Berbrayer D
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Oct; 71(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 1388973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contributions to the understanding of gait control.
    Simonsen EB
    Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4823. PubMed ID: 24814597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Energy transfer mechanisms as a compensatory strategy in below knee amputee runners.
    Czerniecki JM; Gitter AJ; Beck JC
    J Biomech; 1996 Jun; 29(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 9147968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical efficiency during gait of adults with transtibial amputation: a pilot study comparing the SACH, Seattle, and Golden-Ankle prosthetic feet.
    Prince F; Winter DA; Sjonnensen G; Powell C; Wheeldon RK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jun; 35(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 9651889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insights into amputee running. A muscle work analysis.
    Czerniecki JM; Gitter A
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Aug; 71(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 1642820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of the energy-storing capabilities of SACH and Carbon Copy II prosthetic feet during the stance phase of gait in a person with below-knee amputation.
    Barr AE; Siegel KL; Danoff JV; McGarvey CL; Tomasko A; Sable I; Stanhope SJ
    Phys Ther; 1992 May; 72(5):344-54. PubMed ID: 1631203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Energy storing property of so-called energy-storing prosthetic feet.
    Ehara Y; Beppu M; Nomura S; Kunimi Y; Takahashi S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 74(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 8420524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the International Committee of the Red Cross foot with the solid ankle cushion heel foot during gait: a randomized double-blind study.
    Turcot K; Sagawa Y; Lacraz A; Lenoir J; Assal M; Armand S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1490-7. PubMed ID: 23578592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees.
    Fey NP; Klute GK; Neptune RR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Dec; 26(10):1025-32. PubMed ID: 21777999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait.
    Winter DA; Sienko SE
    J Biomech; 1988; 21(5):361-7. PubMed ID: 3417688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resultant lower extremity joint moments in below-knee amputees during running stance.
    Miller DI
    J Biomech; 1987; 20(5):529-41. PubMed ID: 3611127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations.
    Powers CM; Torburn L; Perry J; Ayyappa E
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Jul; 75(7):825-9. PubMed ID: 8024435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of limb alignment on the gait of above-knee amputees.
    Yang L; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD; Paul JP
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(11):981-97. PubMed ID: 1761584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Energy costs and performance of transfemoral amputees and non-amputees during walking and running: A pilot study.
    Mengelkoch LJ; Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):484-491. PubMed ID: 27885098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stance phase control of above-knee prostheses: knee control versus SACH foot design.
    Stein JL; Flowers WC
    J Biomech; 1987; 20(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 3558425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Segment velocities in normal and transtibial amputees: prosthetic design implications.
    Rao SS; Boyd LA; Mulroy SJ; Bontrager EL; Gronley JK; Perry J
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1998 Jun; 6(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 9631330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Below-knee amputee gait in stair ambulation. A comparison of stride characteristics using five different prosthetic feet.
    Torburn L; Schweiger GP; Perry J; Powers CM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jun; (303):185-92. PubMed ID: 8194232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.