These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2027201)
41. Infrapopliteal bypass grafting: use of upper limb vein alone and in autogenous composite grafts. Graham JW; Lusby RJ Surgery; 1982 Jun; 91(6):646-9. PubMed ID: 7079964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Infrapopliteal bypass for critical limb ischaemia. Early experience in the French West Indies. Deneuville M; Stouff S; N'guyen R West Indian Med J; 1996 Jun; 45(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 8772395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Long-term evaluation of composite sequential bypass for limb-threatening ischemia. McCarthy WJ; Pearce WH; Flinn WR; McGee GS; Wang R; Yao JS J Vasc Surg; 1992 May; 15(5):761-9; discussion 769-70. PubMed ID: 1578531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Infrainguinal reconstruction with arm vein, lesser saphenous vein, and remnants of greater saphenous vein: a report of 257 cases. Londrey GL; Bosher LP; Brown PW; Stoneburner FD; Pancoast JW; Davis RK J Vasc Surg; 1994 Sep; 20(3):451-6; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 8084039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Early results of infrainguinal arterial reconstruction with a modified biological conduit. Wagner WH; Levin PM; Treiman RL; Cossman DV; Foran RF; Cohen JL Ann Vasc Surg; 1992 Jul; 6(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 1390019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Factors determining the outcome of crural and pedal revascularisation for critical limb ischaemia. Tordoir JH; van der Plas JP; Jacobs MJ; Kitslaar PJ Eur J Vasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 7(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 8454085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prospective randomized multicenter comparison of in situ and reversed vein infrapopliteal bypasses. Wengerter KR; Veith FJ; Gupta SK; Goldsmith J; Farrell E; Harris PL; Moore D; Shanik G J Vasc Surg; 1991 Feb; 13(2):189-97; discussion 197-9. PubMed ID: 1990160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A comparison of in situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for infrainguinal reconstruction. Fogle MA; Whittemore AD; Couch NP; Mannick JA J Vasc Surg; 1987 Jan; 5(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 3795391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. In situ saphenous vein bypass grafts for limb salvage. A current fad or a viable alternative to reversed vein bypass grafts? Bush HL; Nabseth DC; Curl GR; O'Hara ET; Johnson WC; Vollman RW Am J Surg; 1985 Apr; 149(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 3985287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The benefits of secondary interventions in patients with failing or failed pedal bypass grafts. Rhodes JM; Gloviczki P; Bower TC; Panneton JM; Canton LG; Toomey BJ Am J Surg; 1999 Aug; 178(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 10487269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Is infrapopliteal bypass compromised by distal origin of the proximal anastomosis? Brothers TE; Robison JG; Elliott BM; Arens C Ann Vasc Surg; 1995 Mar; 9(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 7786703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Present status of reversed vein bypass grafting: five-year results of a modern series. Taylor LM; Edwards JM; Porter JM J Vasc Surg; 1990 Feb; 11(2):193-205; discussion 205-6. PubMed ID: 2299743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The use of arm vein in lower-extremity revascularization: results of 520 procedures performed in eight years. Faries PL; Arora S; Pomposelli FB; Pulling MC; Smakowski P; Rohan DI; Gibbons GW; Akbari CM; Campbell DR; LoGerfo FW J Vasc Surg; 2000 Jan; 31(1 Pt 1):50-9. PubMed ID: 10642708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Analysis of autogenous vein femoral-infrapopliteal bypass for limb salvage in the elderly. Hearn AT; Smith JM; Welling RE; Lohr JM; Thibodeaux LC Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Feb; 4(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 8634838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]