113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2027801)
1. Are pregnant women autonomous decision makers?
Murphy EK
Nurs Outlook; 1991; 39(3):144. PubMed ID: 2027801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. States struggle with new ethical questions over the beginning, end of life.
Moskowitz DB
J Am Health Policy; 1993; 3(3):46-9. PubMed ID: 10125736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Compelling pregnancy at death's door.
Taylor KA
Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Canadian Charter as a barrier to unwanted medical treatment of pregnant women in the interests of the foetus.
Jackman M
Health Law Can; 1993; 14(2):49-58. PubMed ID: 10131254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Drug addiction and mother/child welfare. Rights, laws, and discretionary decisionmaking.
Garcia SA
J Leg Med; 1992 Jun; 13(2):129-203. PubMed ID: 1640162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. State abortion statutes on the eve of the Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
Terwilliger LM
J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jun; 25(6):161-74. PubMed ID: 10123589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. RU 486: the politics of choice.
Stulac F
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):77-99. PubMed ID: 10121881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Update: new rights for pregnant employees.
Lines PM
Pers J; 1979 Jan; 58(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 10239889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pregnancy laws guard working women's rights.
Nabhan DM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1993 Jan; 16(1):60, 62. PubMed ID: 10123529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Emerging notions of women's rights and responsibilities during gestation.
Blank RH
J Leg Med; 1986 Dec; 7(4):441-69. PubMed ID: 3492583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. What are the legal rights of the unborn child?
Vernon J
Neonatal Netw; 1997 Jun; 16(4):73-4. PubMed ID: 9216327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. AIDS and the future of reproductive freedom.
Bayer R
Milbank Q; 1990; 68(Suppl. 2):179-204. PubMed ID: 11653914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights.
Schehr AR
Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Burton v. Florida: Maternal-fetal conflicts and medical decision-making during pregnancy.
Wevers K
J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(2):436-40. PubMed ID: 20579240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
Bezanson RP
Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The fragility of the US Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade].
Merchant J
Med Sci (Paris); 2006; 22(8-9):773-5. PubMed ID: 16962056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When being ill is illegal. Women and the criminalization of HIV.
Cooper EB
Health PAC Bull; 1992; 22(4):10-4. PubMed ID: 10124934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An equal protection analysis of United States reproductive health policy: gender, race, age, and class.
Colker R
Duke Law J; 1991 Apr; (2):324-64. PubMed ID: 10114913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pro-choice: a new militancy.
Davis SE
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(6):32-3. PubMed ID: 2606658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The abortion issue in the US.
Fabrizio T
Nord Med; 1990; 105(3):93-4. PubMed ID: 2320407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
