113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2027801)
21. Criminalization of pregnant substance abusers: a health care perspective.
Popovits RM
J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Jun; 24(6):169-81. PubMed ID: 10170728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Equality theory and reproductive freedom.
Colker R
Tex J Women Law; 1994; 3(1):99-122. PubMed ID: 12645608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Gender, race + geography = jeopardy: marginalized women, human rights and HIV in the United States.
Fried ST; Kelly B
Womens Health Issues; 2011 Nov; 21(6 Suppl):S243-9. PubMed ID: 22055674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
Kendall CC
John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
Gallagher A
St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Fetal versus maternal rights.
Owens WL
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 59(5):666-7. PubMed ID: 7070740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Reproduction, rights and public policy: a framework for assessment.
Gowri A
Tex Int Law J; 2000; 35(1):13-29. PubMed ID: 12656084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Marital secrets. The emerging issue of abortion spousal notification laws.
Shore BD
J Leg Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):461-82. PubMed ID: 6983551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
Weitz TA; Yanow S
Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Superimposition of being: the collision of maternal and fetal rights.
Kolner SJ
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1990; 53(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 2271021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Fetal protection update: the Supreme Court decision.
Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1991 Jun; 4(9):9-10. PubMed ID: 10112450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. An evaluation of the costs of pregnancy disability.
McDonough CC; Kistler LH
Empl Benefits J; 1981 Dec; 6(4):7-11, 15. PubMed ID: 10253399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear fetal protection employment policy.
Michel SE
Occup Health Saf; 1990 Jul; 59(7):40-1. PubMed ID: 2388739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. When pregnant patients refuse interventions.
Tauer CA
AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1993; 4(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 8220374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The pregnancy disability amendment: what the law provides, part II.
Trotter R; Zacur SR; Greenwood W
Pers Adm; 1982 Mar; 27(3):55-6, 58. PubMed ID: 10254625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Rights and protection of the pregnant woman today in France].
Ponte C
Soins Pediatr Pueric; 2006 Dec; (233):23-6. PubMed ID: 17236378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Forum on surrogate motherhood. Introduction.
Gostin L
Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):5-6. PubMed ID: 3205042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.
Cherry AL
Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The pregnancy disability amendment: what the law provides: part I.
Trotter R; Zacur SR; Gatewood W
Pers Adm; 1982 Feb; 27(2):47-8, 50-4. PubMed ID: 10254624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Norris decision.
Yohalem MR
Soc Secur Bull; 1984 Apr; 47(4):13-5. PubMed ID: 6710289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
