120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2027832)
1. Ethics in research.
Siegel HS
Poult Sci; 1991 Feb; 70(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 2027832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the research norms of scientists and administrators responsible for academic research integrity.
Korenman SG; Berk R; Wenger NS; Lew V
JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 9424042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: the unholy trinity of scientific writing.
Zietman AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):225-7. PubMed ID: 23958142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The proper conduct of research.
Maurer JJ
Avian Dis; 2007 Mar; 51(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17461259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [How to avoid research misconduct - recommendations for surgeons].
Pitak-Arnnop P; Schouman T; Bertrand JC; Hervé C
J Chir (Paris); 2008; 145(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 19106883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When conflict-of-interest is a factor in scientific misconduct.
Krimsky S
Med Law; 2007 Sep; 26(3):447-63. PubMed ID: 17970245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conflicts of interest and conflicts of commitment.
Werhane P; Doering J
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):47-81. PubMed ID: 11655040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical dilemmas in journal publication.
Babalola O; Grant-Kels JM; Parish LC
Clin Dermatol; 2012; 30(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 22330669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors.
Gollogly L; Momen H
Rev Saude Publica; 2006 Aug; 40 Spec no.():24-9. PubMed ID: 16924299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Retractions due to errors and frauds].
Decullier E; Samson G; Huot L
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):847-52. PubMed ID: 22841376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics in research: what is it and who cares?
Zulkowski K
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):6, 8. PubMed ID: 12377998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Integrity and misconduct in biomedical research].
Schonhaut B L
Rev Chil Pediatr; 2019 Apr; 90(2):217-221. PubMed ID: 31095239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
Claxton LD
Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 15652224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond conflict of interest: the responsible conduct of research.
Rhoades LJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 2002 Jul; 8(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 12353376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring consensus about scientific research norms.
Berk RA; Korenman SG; Wenger NS
Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jul; 6(3):315-40. PubMed ID: 11273458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethics in publication.
Wallace MB; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2015 Jul; 47(7):575-8. PubMed ID: 26099116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):171. PubMed ID: 29895918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication dilemmas.
Hughes G
Emerg Med J; 2007 Sep; 24(9):610. PubMed ID: 17711931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Case studies for teaching research ethics.
Elliott D
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):179-98. PubMed ID: 11655038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Combating plagiarism: a shared responsibility.
Rathod SD
Indian J Med Ethics; 2010; 7(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 20806528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
