186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2028061)
21. Clinical experience of 123I-IMP scintigraphy in detecting vertebral bone metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma. A comparison with bone scintigraphy with 99mTc-MDP.
Suto Y; Iwamiya T; Tanigawa N; Shabana M; Ohta Y
Acta Radiol; 1994 Mar; 35(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 8172743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of radionuclide bone scans and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting spinal metastases.
Gosfield E; Alavi A; Kneeland B
J Nucl Med; 1993 Dec; 34(12):2191-8. PubMed ID: 8254410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intertrabecular vertebral metastases: metastases only detectable on MR imaging.
Yamaguchi T
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2001 Jun; 5(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 11500162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Osteoplastic bone metastases in prostatic carcinoma: magnetic resonance tomography and bone marrow scintigraphy].
Venz S; Hosten N; Friedrichs R; Neumann K; Cordes M; Nagel R; Felix R
Rofo; 1994 Jul; 161(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 8043767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Correlative radionuclide and magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of the spine.
Delbeke D; Powers TA; Sandler MP
Clin Nucl Med; 1989 Oct; 14(10):742-9. PubMed ID: 2805524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of whole-body turboSTIR MR imaging and planar 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases.
Eustace S; Tello R; DeCarvalho V; Carey J; Wroblicka JT; Melhem ER; Yucel EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Dec; 169(6):1655-61. PubMed ID: 9393186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Vertebral metastases and an equivocal bone scan: value of magnetic resonance imaging.
Aitchison FA; Poon FW; Hadley MD; Gray HW; Forrester AW
Nucl Med Commun; 1992 Jun; 13(6):429-31. PubMed ID: 1407869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A case of synovial sarcoma with bone metastasis identified by bone marrow scintigraphy.
Otsuka N; Morita R; Yamamoto T; Muranaka A; Tomomitsu T; Yanagimoto S; Sone T; Fukunaga M
Clin Nucl Med; 1985 Apr; 10(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 2986892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [A comparison of magnetic resonance tomography and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of spinal bone metastases].
Eising EG; Dalicho RW; Stetter G
Rontgenpraxis; 1993 Jul; 46(7):221-5. PubMed ID: 8351574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Dynamic quantitative bone scintigraphy in patients with prostatic carcinoma treated by orchiectomy.
Sundkvist GM; Ahlgren L; Lilja B; Mattsson S; Abrahamsson PA
Eur J Nucl Med; 1990; 16(8-10):671-6. PubMed ID: 2384103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Spinal metastases. Value of diagnostic procedures in the initial diagnosis and follow-up].
Link TM; Sciuk J; Fründt H; Konermann W; Schober O; Peters PE
Radiologe; 1995 Jan; 35(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 7892439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnosis of osteomyelitis: utility of fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Morrison WB; Schweitzer ME; Bock GW; Mitchell DG; Hume EL; Pathria MN; Resnick D
Radiology; 1993 Oct; 189(1):251-7. PubMed ID: 8204132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spinal MR imaging in suspected metastases: correlation with skeletal scintigraphy.
Colletti PM; Dang HT; Deseran MW; Kerr RM; Boswell WD; Ralls PW
Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 9(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 1881253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Magnetic resonance tomography of the bone marrow in cancer patients with a solitary area of increased uptake in the bone scintigram].
Smolarz K; Jungehülsing M; Krug B; Linden A; Göhring UJ; Schicha H
Nuklearmedizin; 1990 Dec; 29(6):269-73. PubMed ID: 2075088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Do short-time SPECT images of bone scintigraphy improve the diagnostic value in the evaluation of solitary lesions in the thoracic spine in patients with extraskeletal malignancies?
Kobayashi K; Okuyama C; Kubota T; Nakai T; Ushijima Y; Nishimura T
Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Oct; 19(7):557-66. PubMed ID: 16363620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does T1- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging give value-added than bone scintigraphy in the follow-up of vertebral metastasis of prostate cancer?
Lee DH; Nam JK; Jung HS; Kim SJ; Chung MK; Park SW
Investig Clin Urol; 2017 Sep; 58(5):324-330. PubMed ID: 28868503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy in bone metastasis detection: a comparative study].
Lucić S; Nikoletić K; Peter A; Lucić MA; Jovanović D
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Jun; 67(6):453-8. PubMed ID: 20629422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [A comparative study of bone scintigraphy and NMR for vertebral diseases].
Nakatani M; Sekiya T; Hata Y; Mori Y; Yasuda M; Kawakami K; Tada S
Kaku Igaku; 1985 Feb; 22(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 3159923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Cause of increased focal uptake in the cervical vertebrae in skeletal scintigraphic routine studies].
Büll U; Winkler U
Rontgenblatter; 1983 Sep; 36(9):305-9. PubMed ID: 6227075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Characteristic appearance of facet osteoarthritis of the lower lumbar spine on planar bone scintigraphy with a high negative predictive value for metastasis.
Kim CK; Park KW
Clin Nucl Med; 2008 Apr; 33(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 18356661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
