566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2028063)
1. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems.
Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H
Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laser alignment system for high-quality portable radiography.
MacMahon H; Yasillo NJ; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1992 Jan; 12(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 1734456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
Busch HP
Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].
Redlich U; Reissberg S; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Scherlach C; Döhring W
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12525979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography.
MacMahon H; Xu XW; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Yoshimura H; Doi K; Carlin M; Kano A; Yao L; Abe K
Radiographics; 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 8316670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
