These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2028837)

  • 21. A multicenter comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers: in vivo and in vitro measurements of bone mineral content and density.
    Economos CD; Nelson ME; Fiatarone MA; Dallal GE; Heymsfield SB; Wang J; Russell-Aulet M; Yasumura S; Ma R; Vaswani AN; Pierson RN
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Feb; 11(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 8822352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers.
    Rencken ML; Murano R; Drinkwater BL; Chesnut CH
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1991 Apr; 48(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 2059876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A portable dual energy x-ray absorptiometry technique for the measurement of bone mineral in preterm infants.
    Williams JR; Davidson F; Menon G; McIntosh N
    Pediatr Res; 1994 Sep; 36(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 7808832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty.
    Cohen B; Rushton N
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 May; 77(3):479-83. PubMed ID: 7744941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine.
    Wahner HW; Dunn WL; Brown ML; Morin RL; Riggs BL
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1988 Nov; 63(11):1075-84. PubMed ID: 3193817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tibial subchondral bone mineral density: sources of variability and reproducibility.
    Boudenot A; Pallu S; Toumi H; Loiseau Peres S; Dolleans E; Lespessailles E
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Oct; 21(10):1586-94. PubMed ID: 23887081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A study of the long-term precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometers and implications for the validity of the least-significant-change calculation.
    Hangartner TN
    Osteoporos Int; 2007 Apr; 18(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 17136486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reproducibility of lateral spine scans using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Larnach TA; Boyd SJ; Smart RC; Butler SP; Rohl PG; Diamond TH
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1992 Oct; 51(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 1422969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bone mineral density measures in longitudinal studies: the choice of phantom is crucial for quality assessment. The Tromsø study, a population-based study.
    Emaus N; Berntsen GK; Joakimsen R; Fønnebø V
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1597-603. PubMed ID: 15886862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Precision of dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral computed tomography using mobile densitometry units.
    Wapniarz M; Lehmann R; Randerath O; Baedeker S; John W; Klein K; Allolio B
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Mar; 54(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 8055370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automatic region of interest determination in dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.
    Verheij LF; Blokland JK; Vossepoel AM; Valkema R; Camps JJ; Papapoulos SE; Bijvoet OM; Pauwels EJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1991; 10(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 18222817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of different dual X-ray absorptiometry brands in a multicenter clinical trial: consequences and limits.
    Slosman DO; Provvedini DM; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD; Sebert JL; De Vernejoul MC; Tsouderos Y; Reginster JY
    J Clin Densitom; 1999; 2(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 23547312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Scanner-induced variability and quality assurance in longitudinal dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements.
    Sievänen H; Oja P; Vuori I
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1795-805. PubMed ID: 7891642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality control of DXA instruments in multicenter trials.
    Faulkner KG; McClung MR
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 7492859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement of bone mineral using multiple-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Swanpalmer J; Kullenberg R; Hansson T
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Feb; 43(2):379-87. PubMed ID: 9509533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Precision of bone densitometry measurements: when is change true change and does it vary across bone density values?
    Wong JC; Griffiths MR
    Australas Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 12890241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of nonmineral tissues on measurement of bone mineral content by dual-photon absorptiometry.
    Sorenson JA
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(5):905-12. PubMed ID: 2233578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques.
    Glüer CC; Blake G; Lu Y; Blunt BA; Jergas M; Genant HK
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 7492865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Long-term in-vitro precision of direct digital X-ray radiogrammetry.
    Dhainaut A; Hoff M; Kälvesten J; Lydersen S; Forslind K; Haugeberg G
    Skeletal Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(12):1575-9. PubMed ID: 21560007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. DXA longitudinal quality control: a comparison of inbuilt quality assurance, visual inspection, multi-rule Shewhart charts and Cusum analysis.
    Garland SW; Lees B; Stevenson JC
    Osteoporos Int; 1997; 7(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 9205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.