These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20297585)

  • 1. [Chlamydia test via Internet a good alternative to testing in clinics].
    Stenqvist K; Lindqvist A; Almerson P; Jonsson L; Lander R
    Lakartidningen; 2010 Feb 10-16; 107(6):350-3. PubMed ID: 20297585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to reach non-clinic populations with mailed self-administered vaginal swabs.
    Gaydos CA; Dwyer K; Barnes M; Rizzo-Price PA; Wood BJ; Flemming T; Hogan MT
    Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Jul; 33(7):451-7. PubMed ID: 16652069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Chlamydia self testing in the county of Kronoberg--an alternative to "Internet Chlamydia tests"].
    Kahlmeter G; Moding R; Blomqvist M
    Lakartidningen; 2010 Oct 27-Nov 2; 107(43):2662. PubMed ID: 21137539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Threefold increase of Chlamydia in Dalecarlia--how could it happen?].
    Anagrius C; Loré B
    Lakartidningen; 2010 Feb 10-16; 107(6):346-9. PubMed ID: 20297584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Detection of Chlamydia infection of an Internet-based commercial product].
    Reinton N; Ødegaard OR; Helgheim A; Moghaddam A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Aug; 127(16):2080-2. PubMed ID: 17717570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary: Chlamydia trachomatis screening: what are we trying to do?
    Peterman TA; Gottlieb SL; Berman SM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 38(2):449-51. PubMed ID: 19174542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The internet, a simple and convenient tool in Chlamydia trachomatis screening of young people.
    Can Commun Dis Rep; 2003 Oct; 29(19):165-9, 172. PubMed ID: 14558410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the Internet for home testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in Sweden: who are the users?
    Novak D; Novak M
    Int J STD AIDS; 2012 Feb; 23(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 22422680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptability of the internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands and insights into nonresponse.
    Greenland KE; Op de Coul EL; van Bergen JE; Brouwers EE; Fennema HJ; Götz HM; Hoebe CJ; Koekenbier RH; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; van den Broek IV
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jun; 38(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 21217416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mailed urine samples are not an effective screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis case finding among young men.
    Domeika M; Oscarsson L; Hallén A; Hjelm E; Sylvan S
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Jul; 21(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 17567309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simplifying chlamydia testing: an innovative Chlamydia trachomatis testing approach using the internet and a home sampling strategy: population based study.
    Novak DP; Karlsson RB
    Sex Transm Infect; 2006 Apr; 82(2):142-7; discussion 152-3. PubMed ID: 16581742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Strong increase of Chlamydia trachomatis. A new mutant and current sexual habits have had "favourable" effects for the transmission].
    Edgardh K
    Lakartidningen; 2007 Nov 21-27; 104(47):3539-42. PubMed ID: 18203587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Home sampling and pooling of vaginal samples are effective tools for genetic screening of Chlamydia trachomatis among high school female students in Lithuania.
    Kucinskiene V; Juseviciute V; Valiukeviciene S; Milasauskiene Z; Unemo M; Domeika M
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2008; 40(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 17852902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving Chlamydia trachomatis retesting rates by mailed self-collection kit.
    Buhrer-Skinner M; Muller R; Buettner PG; Gordon R; Debattista J
    Sex Health; 2011 Jun; 8(2):248-50. PubMed ID: 21592441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The C-project: use of self-collection kits to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis in young people in a community-based health promotion project.
    Martin L; Freedman E; Burton L; Rutter S; Knight V; D'Amato A; Murray C; Drysdale J; Harvey S; McNulty A
    Sex Health; 2009 Jun; 6(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 19457296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of costs, effectiveness, and disease control of a population-based program using home sampling for diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Infections.
    Andersen B; Gundgaard J; Kretzschmar M; Olsen J; Welte R; Oster-Gaard L
    Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Jul; 33(7):407-15. PubMed ID: 16601656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The chlamydia problem in New Zealand.
    Perkins N
    N Z Med J; 2004 May; 117(1194):U887. PubMed ID: 15156205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The internet, a simple and convenient tool in Chlamydia trachomatis screening of young people.
    Novak DP; Edman AC; Jonsson M; Karlsson RB
    Euro Surveill; 2003 Sep; 8(9):171-6. PubMed ID: 14512638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contribution of a urine-based jail screening program to citywide male Chlamydia and gonorrhea case rates in New York City.
    Pathela P; Hennessy RR; Blank S; Parvez F; Franklin W; Schillinger JA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 17989586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is jail screening associated with a decrease in Chlamydia positivity among females seeking health services at community clinics?-San francisco, 1997-2004.
    Barry PM; Kent CK; Scott KC; Goldenson J; Klausner JD
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S22-8. PubMed ID: 18418298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.