These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The Relative Importance of Domain Applicability Metrics for Estimating Prediction Errors in QSAR Varies with Training Set Diversity. Sheridan RP J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1098-107. PubMed ID: 25998559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. General Approach to Estimate Error Bars for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Predictions of Molecular Activity. Liu R; Glover KP; Feasel MG; Wallqvist A J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1561-1575. PubMed ID: 29949366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using beta binomials to estimate classification uncertainty for ensemble models. Clark RD; Liang W; Lee AC; Lawless MS; Fraczkiewicz R; Waldman M J Cheminform; 2014; 6():34. PubMed ID: 24987464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Kernel-Based Method for Assessing Uncertainty on Individual QSAR Predictions. Tebby C; Mombelli E Mol Inform; 2012 Oct; 31(10):741-51. PubMed ID: 27476456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rank order entropy: why one metric is not enough. McLellan MR; Ryan MD; Breneman CM J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2302-19. PubMed ID: 21875058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Species Sensitivity Distribution estimation from uncertain (QSAR-based) effects data. Aldenberg T; Rorije E Altern Lab Anim; 2013 Mar; 41(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 23614542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancing Acute Oral Toxicity Predictions by using Consensus Modeling and Algebraic Form-Based 0D-to-2D Molecular Encodes. García-Jacas CR; Marrero-Ponce Y; Cortés-Guzmán F; Suárez-Lezcano J; Martinez-Rios FO; García-González LA; Pupo-Meriño M; Martinez-Mayorga K Chem Res Toxicol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):1178-1192. PubMed ID: 31066547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. kappa Nearest neighbors QSAR modeling as a variational problem: theory and applications. Itskowitz P; Tropsha A J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(3):777-85. PubMed ID: 15921467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of vapour pressures for halogenated diphenyl ether congeners from molecular descriptors. Oberg TG Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2002; 9(6):405-11. PubMed ID: 12515349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Bayesian nonrigid registration method to enhance intraoperative target definition in image-guided prostate procedures through uncertainty characterization. Pursley J; Risholm P; Fedorov A; Tuncali K; Fennessy FM; Wells WM; Tempany CM; Cormack RA Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6858-67. PubMed ID: 23127078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of specificity and subtype selectivity of ligands binding to serotonin receptors 5HT1E and 5HT1F. Wang XS; Tang H; Golbraikh A; Tropsha A J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):997-1013. PubMed ID: 18470978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Personal exposure to mixtures of volatile organic compounds: modeling and further analysis of the RIOPA data. Batterman S; Su FC; Li S; Mukherjee B; Jia C; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (181):3-63. PubMed ID: 25145040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uncertainty in QSAR predictions. Sahlin U Altern Lab Anim; 2013 Mar; 41(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 23614548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Kernel-based partial least squares: application to fingerprint-based QSAR with model visualization. An Y; Sherman W; Dixon SL J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Sep; 53(9):2312-21. PubMed ID: 23901898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. QSAR--how good is it in practice? Comparison of descriptor sets on an unbiased cross section of corporate data sets. Gedeck P; Rohde B; Bartels C J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(5):1924-36. PubMed ID: 16995723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of noise on the predictive limit of QSAR models. Kolmar SS; Grulke CM J Cheminform; 2021 Nov; 13(1):92. PubMed ID: 34823605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]