These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20298525)

  • 1. Large scale study of multiple-molecule queries.
    Nasr RJ; Swamidass SJ; Baldi PF
    J Cheminform; 2009 Jun; 1(1):7. PubMed ID: 20298525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speeding up chemical searches using the inverted index: the convergence of chemoinformatics and text search methods.
    Nasr R; Vernica R; Li C; Baldi P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):891-900. PubMed ID: 22462644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accurate and efficient target prediction using a potency-sensitive influence-relevance voter.
    Lusci A; Browning M; Fooshee D; Swamidass J; Baldi P
    J Cheminform; 2015; 7():63. PubMed ID: 26719774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ChemDB: a public database of small molecules and related chemoinformatics resources.
    Chen J; Swamidass SJ; Dou Y; Bruand J; Baldi P
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4133-9. PubMed ID: 16174682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consensus queries in ligand-based virtual screening experiments.
    Berenger F; Vu O; Meiler J
    J Cheminform; 2017 Nov; 9(1):60. PubMed ID: 29185065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Virtual screening using binary kernel discrimination: effect of noisy training data and the optimization of performance.
    Chen B; Harrison RF; Pasupa K; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Wood DJ; Lewell XQ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):478-86. PubMed ID: 16562975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and Benchmarking of Open Force Field 2.0.0: The Sage Small Molecule Force Field.
    Boothroyd S; Behara PK; Madin OC; Hahn DF; Jang H; Gapsys V; Wagner JR; Horton JT; Dotson DL; Thompson MW; Maat J; Gokey T; Wang LP; Cole DJ; Gilson MK; Chodera JD; Bayly CI; Shirts MR; Mobley DL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Jun; 19(11):3251-3275. PubMed ID: 37167319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why is Tanimoto index an appropriate choice for fingerprint-based similarity calculations?
    Bajusz D; Rácz A; Héberger K
    J Cheminform; 2015; 7():20. PubMed ID: 26052348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. LEAP into the Pfizer Global Virtual Library (PGVL) space: creation of readily synthesizable design ideas automatically.
    Hu Q; Peng Z; Kostrowicki J; Kuki A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 685():253-76. PubMed ID: 20981528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When is chemical similarity significant? The statistical distribution of chemical similarity scores and its extreme values.
    Baldi P; Nasr R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jul; 50(7):1205-22. PubMed ID: 20540577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One- to four-dimensional kernels for virtual screening and the prediction of physical, chemical, and biological properties.
    Azencott CA; Ksikes A; Swamidass SJ; Chen JH; Ralaivola L; Baldi P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(3):965-74. PubMed ID: 17338509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cumulative query method for influenza surveillance using search engine data.
    Seo DW; Jo MW; Sohn CH; Shin SY; Lee J; Yu M; Kim WY; Lim KS; Lee SI
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Dec; 16(12):e289. PubMed ID: 25517353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advanced SPARQL querying in small molecule databases.
    Galgonek J; Hurt T; Michlíková V; Onderka P; Schwarz J; Vondrášek J
    J Cheminform; 2016; 8():31. PubMed ID: 27275187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins.
    Schuffenhauer A; Floersheim P; Acklin P; Jacoby E
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):391-405. PubMed ID: 12653501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Large-scale learning of structure-activity relationships using a linear support vector machine and problem-specific metrics.
    Hinselmann G; Rosenbaum L; Jahn A; Fechner N; Ostermann C; Zell A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 21207929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do not hesitate to use Tversky-and other hints for successful active analogue searches with feature count descriptors.
    Horvath D; Marcou G; Varnek A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1543-62. PubMed ID: 23731338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Open-source platform to benchmark fingerprints for ligand-based virtual screening.
    Riniker S; Landrum GA
    J Cheminform; 2013 May; 5(1):26. PubMed ID: 23721588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extended similarity indices: the benefits of comparing more than two objects simultaneously. Part 2: speed, consistency, diversity selection.
    Miranda-Quintana RA; Rácz A; Bajusz D; Héberger K
    J Cheminform; 2021 Apr; 13(1):33. PubMed ID: 33892799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.