These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20298645)

  • 1. The a(d) coefficient as a descriptive measure of the within-group agreement of ratings.
    Kreuzpointner L; Simon P; Theis FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):341-60. PubMed ID: 20298645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement.
    Gwet KL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):29-48. PubMed ID: 18482474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and true-score measures of binary items as a function of their Rasch difficulty parameter.
    Dimitrov DM
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):222-33. PubMed ID: 12904673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delta: a new measure of agreement between two raters.
    Andrés AM; Marzo PF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 May; 57(Pt 1):1-19. PubMed ID: 15171798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales.
    Shrivastav R; Sapienza CM; Nandur V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):323-35. PubMed ID: 15989395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel technique to evaluate fluctuations of mood: implications for evaluating course and treatment effects in bipolar/affective disorders.
    Sree Hari Rao V; Raghvendra Rao C; Yeragani VK
    Bipolar Disord; 2006 Oct; 8(5 Pt 1):453-66. PubMed ID: 17042883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The kappa coefficient of agreement for multiple observers when the number of subjects is small.
    Gross ST
    Biometrics; 1986 Dec; 42(4):883-93. PubMed ID: 3814729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of interrater agreement with adjustment for covariates.
    Barlow W
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):695-702. PubMed ID: 10766505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Log-linear non-uniform association models for agreement between two ratings on an ordinal scale.
    Valet F; Guinot C; Mary JY
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(3):647-62. PubMed ID: 16538701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter-observer agreement in the assessment of endoscopic findings in ulcerative colitis.
    de Lange T; Larsen S; Aabakken L
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2004 May; 4():9. PubMed ID: 15149550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.
    Malaty HM; Abudayyeh S; O'Malley KJ; Wilsey MJ; Fraley K; Gilger MA; Hollier D; Graham DY; Rabeneck L
    Pediatrics; 2005 Feb; 115(2):e210-5. PubMed ID: 15687428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [French validation study of the levels of emotional awareness scale].
    Bydlowski S; Corcos M; Paterniti S; Guilbaud O; Jeammet P; Consoli SM
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):310-20. PubMed ID: 12232540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of the pink esthetic score--rating soft tissue esthetics around single-implant restorations with regard to dental observer specialization.
    Gehrke P; Lobert M; Dhom G
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(6):375-84; discussion 385. PubMed ID: 19120783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical implications of the choice between a dichotomous or continuous trait in studies of interobserver agreement.
    Donner A; Eliasziw M
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):550-5. PubMed ID: 19405213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Hartmann WM
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 17563170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling patterns of agreement for nominal scales.
    Roberts C
    Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(6):810-30. PubMed ID: 17634968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequentist performance of Bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):515-23. PubMed ID: 16011699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical models for protein validation using tandem mass spectral data and protein amino acid sequence databases.
    Sadygov RG; Liu H; Yates JR
    Anal Chem; 2004 Mar; 76(6):1664-71. PubMed ID: 15018565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bootstrap confidence intervals in multi-level simultaneous component analysis.
    Timmerman ME; Kiers HA; Smilde AK; Ceulemans E; Stouten J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):299-318. PubMed ID: 18086338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A modified large-sample approach to approximate interval estimation for a particular intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Cappelleri JC; Ting N
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1861-77. PubMed ID: 12754721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.