These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20299559)

  • 41. DNA-based diagnostics for genetically modified cotton: decaplex PCR assay to differentiate MON531 and MON15985 Bt cotton events.
    Randhawa GJ; Singh M; Chhabra R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 958():139-51. PubMed ID: 23143489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Setting the record straight: a rebuttal to an erroneous analysis on transgenic insecticidal crops and natural enemies.
    Shelton AM; Naranjo SE; Romeis J; Hellmich RL; Wolt JD; Federici BA; Albajes R; Bigler F; Burgess EP; Dively GP; Gatehouse AM; Malone LA; Roush R; Sears M; Sehnal F
    Transgenic Res; 2009 Jun; 18(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 19357987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Field survey and greenhouse evaluation of non-rice host plants of the striped stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), as refuges for resistance management of rice transformed with Bacillus thuringiensis toxin genes.
    Cuong NL; Cohen MB
    Bull Entomol Res; 2002 Jun; 92(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 12088543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Management of Insect Pests with Bt Crops in the United States.
    Gassmann AJ; Reisig DD
    Annu Rev Entomol; 2023 Jan; 68():31-49. PubMed ID: 36170641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. FROM Qutn TO Bt COTTON: DEVELOPMENT, ADOPTION AND PROSPECTS. A REVIEW.
    Maik W; Abid MA; Cheema HM; Khan AA; Iqbal MZ; Qayyum A; Hanif M; Bibi N; Yuan SN; Yasmeen A; Mahmood A; Ashraf J
    Tsitol Genet; 2015; 49(6):73-85. PubMed ID: 26841496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Large-scale management of insect resistance to transgenic cotton in Arizona: can transgenic insecticidal crops be sustained?
    Carrière Y; Dennehy TJ; Pedersen B; Haller S; Ellers-Kirk C; Antilla L; Liu YB; Willott E; Tabashnik BE
    J Econ Entomol; 2001 Apr; 94(2):315-25. PubMed ID: 11332820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Refuges in India and delayed resistance to Bt crops.
    Tabashnik B
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Apr; 23(4):414. PubMed ID: 15815660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Bt cotton area contraction drives regional pest resurgence, crop loss, and pesticide use.
    Lu Y; Wyckhuys KAG; Yang L; Liu B; Zeng J; Jiang Y; Desneux N; Zhang W; Wu K
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2022 Feb; 20(2):390-398. PubMed ID: 34626524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Identification and quantification of three genetically modified insect resistant cotton lines using conventional and TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction methods.
    Yang L; Pan A; Zhang K; Guo J; Yin C; Chen J; Huang C; Zhang D
    J Agric Food Chem; 2005 Aug; 53(16):6222-9. PubMed ID: 16076097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. GM crops: Battlefield.
    Waltz E
    Nature; 2009 Sep; 461(7260):27-32. PubMed ID: 19727179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates and their differential toxicity against Helicoverpa armigera populations.
    Anitha D; Kumar NS; Vijayan D; Ajithkumar K; Gurusubramanian G
    J Basic Microbiol; 2011 Feb; 51(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21077117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Bacillus thuringiensis as a specific, safe, and effective tool for insect pest control.
    Roh JY; Choi JY; Li MS; Jin BR; Je YH
    J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):547-59. PubMed ID: 18051264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Survey raises concerns about Bt resistance management.
    Dove A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Apr; 19(4):293-4. PubMed ID: 11283558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A critical assessment of the effects of Bt transgenic plants on parasitoids.
    Chen M; Zhao JZ; Collins HL; Earle ED; Cao J; Shelton AM
    PLoS One; 2008 May; 3(5):e2284. PubMed ID: 18523682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The distinct properties of natural and GM cry insecticidal proteins.
    Latham JR; Love M; Hilbeck A
    Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev; 2017 Apr; 33(1):62-96. PubMed ID: 28901209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Relationships between exogenous-toxin quantity and increased biomass of transgenic Bt crops under elevated carbon dioxide.
    Chen F; Wu G; Ge F; Parajulee MN
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2011 May; 74(4):1074-80. PubMed ID: 21349582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Relevance of Bt toxin interaction studies for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops.
    De Schrijver A; De Clercq P; de Maagd RA; van Frankenhuyzen K
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2015 Dec; 13(9):1221-3. PubMed ID: 26032006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Successes and challenges of managing resistance in Helicoverpa armigera to Bt cotton in Australia.
    Downes S; Mahon R
    GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 22572906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Mating compatibility among helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) occurring on selected host plants and Bt cotton survivors.
    Vijaykumar ; Bashasab F; Krishnareddy KB; Kuruvinashetti MS; Patil BV
    J Econ Entomol; 2007 Jun; 100(3):903-8. PubMed ID: 17598554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bioengineering: Evolved to overcome Bt-toxin resistance.
    Dovrat D; Aharoni A
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7601):39-40. PubMed ID: 27120166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.