260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20299559)
41. ABCs of Insect Resistance to Bt.
Tabashnik BE
PLoS Genet; 2015 Nov; 11(11):e1005646. PubMed ID: 26583776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. DNA-based diagnostics for genetically modified cotton: decaplex PCR assay to differentiate MON531 and MON15985 Bt cotton events.
Randhawa GJ; Singh M; Chhabra R
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 958():139-51. PubMed ID: 23143489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Setting the record straight: a rebuttal to an erroneous analysis on transgenic insecticidal crops and natural enemies.
Shelton AM; Naranjo SE; Romeis J; Hellmich RL; Wolt JD; Federici BA; Albajes R; Bigler F; Burgess EP; Dively GP; Gatehouse AM; Malone LA; Roush R; Sears M; Sehnal F
Transgenic Res; 2009 Jun; 18(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 19357987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Field survey and greenhouse evaluation of non-rice host plants of the striped stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), as refuges for resistance management of rice transformed with Bacillus thuringiensis toxin genes.
Cuong NL; Cohen MB
Bull Entomol Res; 2002 Jun; 92(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 12088543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Management of Insect Pests with Bt Crops in the United States.
Gassmann AJ; Reisig DD
Annu Rev Entomol; 2023 Jan; 68():31-49. PubMed ID: 36170641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. FROM Qutn TO Bt COTTON: DEVELOPMENT, ADOPTION AND PROSPECTS. A REVIEW.
Maik W; Abid MA; Cheema HM; Khan AA; Iqbal MZ; Qayyum A; Hanif M; Bibi N; Yuan SN; Yasmeen A; Mahmood A; Ashraf J
Tsitol Genet; 2015; 49(6):73-85. PubMed ID: 26841496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Large-scale management of insect resistance to transgenic cotton in Arizona: can transgenic insecticidal crops be sustained?
Carrière Y; Dennehy TJ; Pedersen B; Haller S; Ellers-Kirk C; Antilla L; Liu YB; Willott E; Tabashnik BE
J Econ Entomol; 2001 Apr; 94(2):315-25. PubMed ID: 11332820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Refuges in India and delayed resistance to Bt crops.
Tabashnik B
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Apr; 23(4):414. PubMed ID: 15815660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Bt cotton area contraction drives regional pest resurgence, crop loss, and pesticide use.
Lu Y; Wyckhuys KAG; Yang L; Liu B; Zeng J; Jiang Y; Desneux N; Zhang W; Wu K
Plant Biotechnol J; 2022 Feb; 20(2):390-398. PubMed ID: 34626524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A critical assessment of the effects of Bt transgenic plants on parasitoids.
Chen M; Zhao JZ; Collins HL; Earle ED; Cao J; Shelton AM
PLoS One; 2008 May; 3(5):e2284. PubMed ID: 18523682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Identification and quantification of three genetically modified insect resistant cotton lines using conventional and TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction methods.
Yang L; Pan A; Zhang K; Guo J; Yin C; Chen J; Huang C; Zhang D
J Agric Food Chem; 2005 Aug; 53(16):6222-9. PubMed ID: 16076097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. GM crops: Battlefield.
Waltz E
Nature; 2009 Sep; 461(7260):27-32. PubMed ID: 19727179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates and their differential toxicity against Helicoverpa armigera populations.
Anitha D; Kumar NS; Vijayan D; Ajithkumar K; Gurusubramanian G
J Basic Microbiol; 2011 Feb; 51(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21077117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Bacillus thuringiensis as a specific, safe, and effective tool for insect pest control.
Roh JY; Choi JY; Li MS; Jin BR; Je YH
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):547-59. PubMed ID: 18051264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Survey raises concerns about Bt resistance management.
Dove A
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Apr; 19(4):293-4. PubMed ID: 11283558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The distinct properties of natural and GM cry insecticidal proteins.
Latham JR; Love M; Hilbeck A
Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev; 2017 Apr; 33(1):62-96. PubMed ID: 28901209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Relationships between exogenous-toxin quantity and increased biomass of transgenic Bt crops under elevated carbon dioxide.
Chen F; Wu G; Ge F; Parajulee MN
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2011 May; 74(4):1074-80. PubMed ID: 21349582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Relevance of Bt toxin interaction studies for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops.
De Schrijver A; De Clercq P; de Maagd RA; van Frankenhuyzen K
Plant Biotechnol J; 2015 Dec; 13(9):1221-3. PubMed ID: 26032006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Successes and challenges of managing resistance in Helicoverpa armigera to Bt cotton in Australia.
Downes S; Mahon R
GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 22572906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Mating compatibility among helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) occurring on selected host plants and Bt cotton survivors.
Vijaykumar ; Bashasab F; Krishnareddy KB; Kuruvinashetti MS; Patil BV
J Econ Entomol; 2007 Jun; 100(3):903-8. PubMed ID: 17598554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
