BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20300623)

  • 1. A new statistic to evaluate imputation reliability.
    Lin P; Hartz SM; Zhang Z; Saccone SF; Wang J; Tischfield JA; Edenberg HJ; Kramer JR; M Goate A; Bierut LJ; Rice JP;
    PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9697. PubMed ID: 20300623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of genotype imputation performance using 1000 Genomes in African American studies.
    Hancock DB; Levy JL; Gaddis NC; Bierut LJ; Saccone NL; Page GP; Johnson EO
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50610. PubMed ID: 23226329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imputation across genotyping arrays for genome-wide association studies: assessment of bias and a correction strategy.
    Johnson EO; Hancock DB; Levy JL; Gaddis NC; Saccone NL; Bierut LJ; Page GP
    Hum Genet; 2013 May; 132(5):509-22. PubMed ID: 23334152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies.
    Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE
    BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the performance of two commercial genome-wide association study genotyping platforms in Han Chinese samples.
    Jiang L; Willner D; Danoy P; Xu H; Brown MA
    G3 (Bethesda); 2013 Jan; 3(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 23316436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive evaluation of imputation performance in African Americans.
    Chanda P; Yuhki N; Li M; Bader JS; Hartz A; Boerwinkle E; Kao WH; Arking DE
    J Hum Genet; 2012 Jul; 57(7):411-21. PubMed ID: 22648186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artifact due to differential error when cases and controls are imputed from different platforms.
    Sinnott JA; Kraft P
    Hum Genet; 2012 Jan; 131(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 21735171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genotype imputation of Metabochip SNPs using a study-specific reference panel of ~4,000 haplotypes in African Americans from the Women's Health Initiative.
    Liu EY; Buyske S; Aragaki AK; Peters U; Boerwinkle E; Carlson C; Carty C; Crawford DC; Haessler J; Hindorff LA; Marchand LL; Manolio TA; Matise T; Wang W; Kooperberg C; North KE; Li Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 36(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 22851474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extending the use of GWAS data by combining data from different genetic platforms.
    van Iperen EP; Hovingh GK; Asselbergs FW; Zwinderman AH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172082. PubMed ID: 28245255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When Does Choice of Accuracy Measure Alter Imputation Accuracy Assessments?
    Ramnarine S; Zhang J; Chen LS; Culverhouse R; Duan W; Hancock DB; Hartz SM; Johnson EO; Olfson E; Schwantes-An TH; Saccone NL
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0137601. PubMed ID: 26458263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False positive findings during genome-wide association studies with imputation: influence of allele frequency and imputation accuracy.
    Zhang Z; Xiao X; Zhou W; Zhu D; Amos CI
    Hum Mol Genet; 2021 Dec; 31(1):146-155. PubMed ID: 34368847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of genome-wide genotyping and reference panels on rare variants imputation.
    Zheng HF; Ladouceur M; Greenwood CM; Richards JB
    J Genet Genomics; 2012 Oct; 39(10):545-50. PubMed ID: 23089364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An empirical evaluation of imputation accuracy for association statistics reveals increased type-I error rates in genome-wide associations.
    Almeida MA; Oliveira PS; Pereira TV; Krieger JE; Pereira AC
    BMC Genet; 2011 Jan; 12():10. PubMed ID: 21251252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High imputation accuracy from informative low-to-medium density single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes is achievable in sheep1.
    O'Brien AC; Judge MM; Fair S; Berry DP
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 30722011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imputation accuracy to whole-genome sequence in Nellore cattle.
    Fernandes Júnior GA; Carvalheiro R; de Oliveira HN; Sargolzaei M; Costilla R; Ventura RV; Fonseca LFS; Neves HHR; Hayes BJ; de Albuquerque LG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Mar; 53(1):27. PubMed ID: 33711929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genotype imputation for African Americans using data from HapMap phase II versus 1000 genomes projects.
    Sung YJ; Gu CC; Tiwari HK; Arnett DK; Broeckel U; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 36(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 22644746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison among three variant callers and assessment of the accuracy of imputation from SNP array data to whole-genome sequence level in chicken.
    Ni G; Strom TM; Pausch H; Reimer C; Preisinger R; Simianer H; Erbe M
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():824. PubMed ID: 26486989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of Genetic Relationships Between Individuals Across Cohorts and Platforms: Application to Childhood Height.
    Fedko IO; Hottenga JJ; Medina-Gomez C; Pappa I; van Beijsterveldt CE; Ehli EA; Davies GE; Rivadeneira F; Tiemeier H; Swertz MA; Middeldorp CM; Bartels M; Boomsma DI
    Behav Genet; 2015 Sep; 45(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26036992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two adjustment strategies for imputation across genotyping arrays.
    Xie Y; Hancock DB; Johnson EO; Rice JP
    Hum Hered; 2014; 78(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 25033910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imputation reliability on DNA biallelic markers for drug metabolism studies.
    Mijatovic V; Iacobucci I; Sazzini M; Xumerle L; Mori A; Pignatti PF; Martinelli G; Malerba G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 14(Suppl 14):S7. PubMed ID: 23095502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.