These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20300637)

  • 1. Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too much variation.
    Parnell AC; Inger R; Bearhop S; Jackson AL
    PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9672. PubMed ID: 20300637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unifying error structures in commonly used biotracer mixing models.
    Stock BC; Semmens BX
    Ecology; 2016 Oct; 97(10):2562-2569. PubMed ID: 27859126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining sources in stable isotope mixing models: alternative methods.
    Phillips DL; Newsome SD; Gregg JW
    Oecologia; 2005 Aug; 144(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 15711995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of spatial and seasonal variations in the proportional contribution of nitrate sources using a multi-isotope approach and Bayesian isotope mixing model.
    Meghdadi A; Javar N
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Apr; 235():207-222. PubMed ID: 29289831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources.
    Phillips DL; Gregg JW
    Oecologia; 2003 Jul; 136(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 12759813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models.
    Moore JW; Semmens BX
    Ecol Lett; 2008 May; 11(5):470-80. PubMed ID: 18294213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analyzing mixing systems using a new generation of Bayesian tracer mixing models.
    Stock BC; Jackson AL; Ward EJ; Parnell AC; Phillips DL; Semmens BX
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5096. PubMed ID: 29942712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond simple linear mixing models: process-based isotope partitioning of ecological processes.
    Ogle K; Tucker C; Cable JM
    Ecol Appl; 2014 Jan; 24(1):181-95. PubMed ID: 24640543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FRAME-Monte Carlo model for evaluation of the stable isotope mixing and fractionation.
    Lewicki MP; Lewicka-Szczebak D; Skrzypek G
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277204. PubMed ID: 36441721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Erroneous behaviour of MixSIR, a recently published Bayesian isotope mixing model: a discussion of Moore & Semmens (2008).
    Jackson AL; Inger R; Bearhop S; Parnell A
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Mar; 12(3):E1-5. PubMed ID: 18691222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Including source uncertainty and prior information in the analysis of stable isotope mixing models.
    Ward EJ; Semmens BX; Schindler DE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(12):4645-50. PubMed ID: 20496928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using dual isotopes and a Bayesian isotope mixing model to evaluate sources of nitrate of Tai Lake, China.
    Liu S; Wu F; Feng W; Guo W; Song F; Wang H; Wang Y; He Z; Giesy JP; Zhu P; Tang Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Nov; 25(32):32631-32639. PubMed ID: 30242656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent Bayesian stable-isotope mixing models are highly sensitive to variation in discrimination factors.
    Bond AL; Diamond AW
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Jun; 21(4):1017-23. PubMed ID: 21774408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes.
    Phillips DL; Gregg JW
    Oecologia; 2001 Apr; 127(2):171-179. PubMed ID: 24577646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter-comparison of stable isotope mixing models for determining plant water source partitioning.
    Wang J; Lu N; Fu B
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 May; 666():685-693. PubMed ID: 30812003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantifying nitrate sources in a large reservoir for drinking water by using stable isotopes and a Bayesian isotope mixing model.
    Jin Z; Cen J; Hu Y; Li L; Shi Y; Fu G; Li F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jul; 26(20):20364-20376. PubMed ID: 31102220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying inter- and intra-population niche variability using hierarchical bayesian stable isotope mixing models.
    Semmens BX; Ward EJ; Moore JW; Darimont CT
    PLoS One; 2009 Jul; 4(7):e6187. PubMed ID: 19587790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nitrate contamination and source apportionment in surface and groundwater in Ghana using dual isotopes (
    Gibrilla A; Fianko JR; Ganyaglo S; Adomako D; Anornu G; Zakaria N
    J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Aug; 233():103658. PubMed ID: 32505052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying learning in biotracer studies.
    Brown CJ; Brett MT; Adame MF; Stewart-Koster B; Bunn SE
    Oecologia; 2018 Jul; 187(3):597-608. PubMed ID: 29651662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.