These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2030217)

  • 21. Binaural interference in lateralization thresholds for interaural time and level differences.
    Heller LM; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):310-9. PubMed ID: 20649226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference.
    Henning GB; Richards VM; Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3229-40. PubMed ID: 16334902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The masking-level difference in low-noise noise.
    Hall JW; Grose JH; Hartmann WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2573-7. PubMed ID: 9604351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inter-individual differences in binaural detection of low-frequency or high-frequency tonal signals masked by narrow-band or broadband noise.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C; Hyde EL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2069-78. PubMed ID: 9566329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coding of temporally fluctuating interaural timing disparities in a binaural processing model based on phase differences.
    Dietz M; Ewert SD; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():234-45. PubMed ID: 17949695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of signal duration on NoSo and NoS pi thresholds at 500 Hz and 4 kHz.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1776-83. PubMed ID: 10089601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Binaural processing of noisy stimuli: internal/external noise ratios for diotic and dichotic stimuli.
    Siegel RA; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2122-8. PubMed ID: 2600302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech segregation in rooms: effects of reverberation on both target and interferer.
    Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1713. PubMed ID: 17927431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A crew of listeners with no more than "slight" hearing loss who exhibit binaural deficits also exhibit reduced amounts of binaural interference.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2977. PubMed ID: 34717472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Masking-level differences in the elderly: a comparison of antiphasic and time-delay dichotic conditions.
    Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1410-22. PubMed ID: 1787722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of noise-bandwidth, noise-fringe duration, and temporal signal location on the binaural masking-level difference.
    Yasin I; Henning GB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):327-38. PubMed ID: 22779481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Binaural advantage for sound pattern identification.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Rohtla TL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1977-86. PubMed ID: 7593920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Binaural interference in the free field.
    Croghan NB; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3085-91. PubMed ID: 21117757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Anderson S; Ellis R; Mehta J; Goupell MJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec; 120(6):2939-2952. PubMed ID: 30230989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Within- and across-channel processes in modulation detection interference.
    Mendoza L; Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 May; 97(5 Pt 1):3072-9. PubMed ID: 7759647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of stimulus envelope and fine structure on the binaural masking level difference.
    Eddins DA; Barber LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2578-89. PubMed ID: 9604352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. II: Influence of frequency and interaural-phase uncertainty.
    Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1749-56. PubMed ID: 2262631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neural responses in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level differences created by inverting the noise in one ear.
    Palmer AR; Jiang D; McAlpine D
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Aug; 84(2):844-52. PubMed ID: 10938311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diotic and dichotic detection using multiplied-noise maskers.
    van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2100-10. PubMed ID: 9566331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech segregation in rooms: monaural, binaural, and interacting effects of reverberation on target and interferer.
    Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2237-48. PubMed ID: 18397029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.