These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2030220)

  • 1. Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure.
    Cokely JA; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1331-9. PubMed ID: 2030220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels.
    Stillman JA; Irwin RJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 2326150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of across-frequency processes in dichotic listening conditions.
    Nitschmann M; Verhey JL; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3188-98. PubMed ID: 20000932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Off-frequency BMLD: the role of monaural processing.
    van de Par S; Luebken B; Verhey JL; Kohlrausch A
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():293-301. PubMed ID: 23716235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The phase angle of addition in temporal masking for diotic and dichotic listening conditions.
    Yost WA; Grantham DW; Lutfi RA; Stern RM
    Hear Res; 1982 Aug; 7(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 7118730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spectral integration of broadband signals in diotic and dichotic masking experiments.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):317-26. PubMed ID: 1737880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diotic and dichotic detection using multiplied-noise maskers.
    van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2100-10. PubMed ID: 9566331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of dichotic/diotic versus monotic presentation on speech understanding in noise in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kaplan H; Pickett JM
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 7297784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference.
    Henning GB; Richards VM; Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3229-40. PubMed ID: 16334902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band.
    Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Dec; 82(6):1944-56. PubMed ID: 3429732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NoSo and NoS pi detection as a function of masker bandwidth in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Staffel JG; Hall JW; Grose JH; Pillsbury HC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1720-7. PubMed ID: 2341676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. I: Influence of signal and masker duration.
    Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1737-48. PubMed ID: 2262630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Masking produced by broadband noise presented in virtual auditory space.
    Carlile S; Wardman D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3761-8. PubMed ID: 8969477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prior stimulation and the masking-level difference.
    Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Sep; 78(3):901-7. PubMed ID: 4031260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. II: Influence of frequency and interaural-phase uncertainty.
    Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1749-56. PubMed ID: 2262631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory filter bandwidths in binaural and monaural listening conditions.
    Kollmeier B; Holube I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1889-901. PubMed ID: 1401533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
    Wong WY; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.