BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20302418)

  • 41. The effect of context priming and task type on augmentative communication performance.
    Higginbotham DJ; Bisantz AM; Sunm M; Adams K; Yik F
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009 Mar; 25(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 18608144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Reliability of speech generating devices: a 5-year review.
    Shepherd TA; Campbell KA; Renzoni AM; Sloan N
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009; 25(3):145-53. PubMed ID: 19544105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinicians' description of factors influencing their reporting of suspected child abuse: report of the Child Abuse Reporting Experience Study Research Group.
    Jones R; Flaherty EG; Binns HJ; Price LL; Slora E; Abney D; Harris DL; Christoffel KK; Sege RD;
    Pediatrics; 2008 Aug; 122(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 18676541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evidence-based literacy instruction for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: a case study of a student with multiple disabilities.
    Light J; McNaughton D; Weyer M; Karg L
    Semin Speech Lang; 2008 May; 29(2):120-32. PubMed ID: 18645914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Experiences of adults with complex communication needs receiving and using low tech AAC: an Australian context.
    Iacono T; Lyon K; Johnson H; West D
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Sep; 8(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 23992458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Purposes of AAC device use for persons with ALS as reported by caregivers.
    Fried-Oken M; Fox L; Rau MT; Tullman J; Baker G; Hindal M; Wile N; Lou JS
    Augment Altern Commun; 2006 Sep; 22(3):209-21. PubMed ID: 17114164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Research directions in augmentative and alternative communication for preschool children.
    Sevcik RA; Romski MA; Adamson LB
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Nov 4-18; 26(21-22):1323-9. PubMed ID: 15513732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. "Now I am a techie too" - parental perceptions of using mobile technology for communication by children with complex communication needs in the Global South.
    Hettiarachchi S; Kitnasamy G; Gopi D
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):183-194. PubMed ID: 30735067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Seeking serenity: living with HIV/AIDS in rural Western Canada.
    Groft JN; Robinson Vollman A
    Rural Remote Health; 2007; 7(2):677. PubMed ID: 17516839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a research review.
    Millar DC; Light JC; Schlosser RW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):248-64. PubMed ID: 16671842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) for adults with severe aphasia: where we stand and how we can go further.
    Jacobs B; Drew R; Ogletree BT; Pierce K
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Nov 4-18; 26(21-22):1231-40. PubMed ID: 15513721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Advances in augmentative and alternative communication as quality-of-life technology.
    Hill K
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2010 Feb; 21(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 19951777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The role of active participation in interaction for children who use augmentative and alternative communication.
    Sundqvist A; Plejert C; Rönnberg J
    Commun Med; 2010; 7(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 22049639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Parents' perception on the use of augmentative and alternative communication by children with complex communication needs in Malaysia.
    Joginder Singh S; Mohd Ayob N; Hassan FH
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Jan; 18(1):118-126. PubMed ID: 36344474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Toward greater involvement of youth with complex communication needs in the selection of augmentative and alternative communication devices.
    Swett C; Surins H; Welton C; Shepherd TA; Renzoni AM; Ryan SE
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 30652627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Chinese-English speaking family perspectives of augmentative and alternative communication use with their children.
    Sun T; Bowles RP; Douglas SN
    J Commun Disord; 2023; 102():106315. PubMed ID: 36822146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Augmentative and alternative communication and literacy teams: facing the challenges, forging ahead.
    Fallon KA; Katz LA
    Semin Speech Lang; 2008 May; 29(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 18645913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis.
    Baxter S; Enderby P; Evans P; Judge S
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 22369053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Access to augmentative and alternative communication: new technologies and clinical decision-making.
    Fager S; Bardach L; Russell S; Higginbotham J
    J Pediatr Rehabil Med; 2012; 5(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 22543893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Making a voice heard: evaluation of a new service delivery in augmentative and alternative communication through qualitative interviews with people without natural speech.
    Zinkevich A; Uthoff SAK; Boenisch J; Sachse SK; Schnack H; Garbe C; Bernasconi T; Ansmann L
    BMC Res Notes; 2023 Mar; 16(1):42. PubMed ID: 36991499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.