153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20304264)
1. How to review journal manuscripts.
Rosenfeld RM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Apr; 142(4):472-86. PubMed ID: 20304264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Shared responsibility in expert review of original articles].
Shashok K
Rev Neurol; 1997 Dec; 25(148):1946-50. PubMed ID: 9528039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Journal policy on ethics in scientific publication.
Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 12514687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Author perception of peer review.
Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Science, politics, and peer review. An editor's dilemma.
McCarty R
Am Psychol; 2002 Mar; 57(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 11905119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Editors' requests of peer reviewers: a study and a proposal.
Frank E
Prev Med; 1996; 25(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 8860274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA
J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?
Al-Khatib A; Teixeira da Silva JA
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Feb; 25(1):293-321. PubMed ID: 28905258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dealing with returned manuscripts.
Peh WC; Ng KH
Singapore Med J; 2009 Nov; 50(11):1050-2; quiz 1053. PubMed ID: 19960157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alphabetic bias in the selection of reviewers for the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Richardson ML
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):W213-6. PubMed ID: 19020207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Write a scientific paper (WASP): Editor's perspective of submissions and dealing with editors.
Cuschieri S; Vassallo J
Early Hum Dev; 2019 Feb; 129():93-95. PubMed ID: 30578111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study.
Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS
BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review of manuscripts.
Ludbrook J
J Clin Neurosci; 2002 Mar; 9(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 11922694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
