These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20305735)

  • 21. Rate of conditioned reinforcement affects observing rate but not resistance to change.
    Shahan TA; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16156134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.
    Lieving GA; Reilly MP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17002227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Control by reinforcers across time and space: A review of recent choice research.
    Cowie S; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Mar; 105(2):246-69. PubMed ID: 27002686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Motivational views of reinforcement: implications for understanding the behavioral functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine.
    Salamone JD; Correa M
    Behav Brain Res; 2002 Dec; 137(1-2):3-25. PubMed ID: 12445713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The generalized matching law as a predictor of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys.
    Anderson KG; Velkey AJ; Woolverton WL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):319-26. PubMed ID: 12373433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Context: a central concept.
    Fantino E
    Behav Processes; 2001 May; 54(1-3):95-110. PubMed ID: 11369463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues.
    Williams BA
    Behav Anal; 1994; 17(2):261-85. PubMed ID: 22478192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Temporal context and conditioned reinforcement value.
    Grace RC; Savastano HI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2000 Dec; 129(4):427-43. PubMed ID: 11142856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Within-trial contrast: pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that follow a relatively more rather than a less aversive event.
    Zentall TR; Singer RA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Jul; 88(1):131-49. PubMed ID: 17725056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A cumulative decision model for three-alternative choice in concurrent chains.
    Grace RC; McLean AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(3):259-72. PubMed ID: 27379716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An invariant relation between changing over and reinforcement.
    Dreyfus LR; Dorman LG; Fetterman JG; Stubbs DA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Nov; 38(3):327-38. PubMed ID: 16812304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Enhancing second-order conditioning with lesions of the basolateral amygdala.
    Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 130(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 26795578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Human Choice Predicted by Obtained Reinforcers, Not by Reinforcement Predictors.
    Stagner JP; Edwards VM; Bond SR; Jasmer JA; Southern RA; Bodily KD
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1631. PubMed ID: 32849000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What's in a Click? The Efficacy of Conditioned Reinforcement in Applied Animal Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Pfaller-Sadovsky N; Hurtado-Parrado C; Cardillo D; Medina LG; Friedman SG
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 32998242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.
    Killeen PR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Sep; 38(2):217-32. PubMed ID: 16812299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distinct effects of ventral tegmental area NMDA and acetylcholine receptor blockade on conditioned reinforcement produced by food-associated cues.
    Wickham RJ; Solecki WB; Nunes EJ; Addy NA
    Neuroscience; 2015 Aug; 301():384-94. PubMed ID: 26093048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Behavioral functions of stimuli signaling transitions across rich and lean schedules of reinforcement.
    Everly JB; Holtyn AF; Perone M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):201-14. PubMed ID: 24446283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Human observing: maintained by negative informative stimuli only if correlated with improvement in response efficiency.
    Case DA; Fantino E; Wixted J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 May; 43(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 4020320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The observing-response procedure: a novel method to study drug-associated conditioned reinforcement.
    Shahan TA
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2002 Feb; 10(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 11866250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.