These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20306115)

  • 1. Effects of feedback from active and passive body parts on spatial and temporal parameters in sensorimotor synchronization.
    Keller PE; Ishihara M; Prinz W
    Cogn Process; 2011 Feb; 12(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 20306115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of sensory information in the production of periodic finger-tapping sequences.
    Billon M; Semjen A; Cole J; Gauthier G
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Jun; 110(1):117-30. PubMed ID: 8817263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of the primary somatosensory cortex in an auditorily paced finger tapping task.
    Pollok B; Müller K; Aschersleben G; Schnitzler A; Prinz W
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 May; 156(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 15007587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tapping with peripheral nerve block. a role for tactile feedback in the timing of movements.
    Aschersleben G; Gehrke J; Prinz W
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Feb; 136(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 11243475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synchronization in repetitive smooth movement requires perceptible events.
    Studenka BE; Zelaznik HN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):432-41. PubMed ID: 21300324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tactile feedback contributes to consistency of finger movements during typing.
    Rabin E; Gordon AM
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 14689143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MEG responses during rhythmic finger tapping in humans to phasic stimulation and their interpretation based on neural mechanisms.
    Yoshino K; Takagi K; Nomura T; Sato S; Tonoike M
    Biol Cybern; 2002 Jun; 86(6):483-96. PubMed ID: 12111276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How the brain controls repetitive finger movements.
    Pollok B; Gross J; Schnitzler A
    J Physiol Paris; 2006 Jan; 99(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 16039102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual feedback is not important for bimanual human interval timing.
    Studenka BE; Cummins DL; Myers K
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):857-864. PubMed ID: 31982935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal prediction abilities are mediated by motor effector and rhythmic expertise.
    Manning FC; Harris J; Schutz M
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):861-871. PubMed ID: 27909748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical activations associated with auditorily paced finger tapping.
    Pollok B; Müller K; Aschersleben G; Schmitz F; Schnitzler A; Prinz W
    Neuroreport; 2003 Feb; 14(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 12598739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stop signals delay synchrony more for finger tapping than vocalization: a dual modality study of rhythmic synchronization in the stop signal task.
    Castro-Meneses LJ; Sowman PF
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5242. PubMed ID: 30013856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cortical activations during paced finger-tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli.
    Jäncke L; Loose R; Lutz K; Specht K; Shah NJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2000 Sep; 10(1-2):51-66. PubMed ID: 10978692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corticokinematic coherence during active and passive finger movements.
    Piitulainen H; Bourguignon M; De Tiège X; Hari R; Jousmäki V
    Neuroscience; 2013 May; 238():361-70. PubMed ID: 23402851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tactile feedback and timing accuracy in piano performance.
    Goebl W; Palmer C
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 186(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 18193412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Sense of Agency Is More Sensitive to Manipulations of Outcome than Movement-Related Feedback Irrespective of Sensory Modality.
    David N; Skoruppa S; Gulberti A; Schultz J; Engel AK
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161156. PubMed ID: 27536948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relevance-dependent modulation of tactile suppression during active, passive and pantomime reach-to-grasp movements.
    Manzone DM; Inglis JT; Franks IM; Chua R
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 339():93-105. PubMed ID: 29162384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal synchronization for in-phase and antiphase movements during bilateral finger- and foot-tapping tasks.
    Numata A; Terao Y; Owari N; Kakizaki C; Sugawara K; Ugawa Y; Furubayashi T
    Hum Mov Sci; 2022 Aug; 84():102967. PubMed ID: 35687915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Timing at peak force may be the hidden target controlled in continuation and synchronization tapping.
    Du Y; Clark JE; Whitall J
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1541-1554. PubMed ID: 28251338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modality specific functional interaction in sensorimotor synchronization.
    Pollok B; Krause V; Butz M; Schnitzler A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Jun; 30(6):1783-90. PubMed ID: 19301250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.