These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20306442)

  • 1. Rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of visual field defects in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
    Celebisoy N; Oztürk T; Köse T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(4):756-62. PubMed ID: 20306442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parallel rarebits: a novel, large-scale visual field screening method.
    Lin SR; Fijalkowski N; Lin BR; Li F; Singh K; Chang RT
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 25331077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Threshold Static Automated Perimetry of the Full Visual Field in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
    Wall M; Subramani A; Chong LX; Galindo R; Turpin A; Kardon RH; Thurtell MJ; Bailey JA; Marin-Franch I
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2019 May; 60(6):1898-1905. PubMed ID: 31042797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry.
    Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Parisi L; Zeppieri M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 89(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 15665349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using motion perimetry to detect visual field defects in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Montgomery EB
    Neurology; 1995 Jun; 45(6):1169-75. PubMed ID: 7783884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new visual field test in empty sella syndrome: rarebit perimetry.
    Yavas GF; Küsbeci T; Eser O; Ermis SS; Coşar M; Oztürk F
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(4):628-32. PubMed ID: 18609487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.
    Mousa MF; Cubbidge RP; Al-Mansouri F; Bener A
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24511212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rarebit perimetry in normal subjects: test-retest variability, learning effect, normative range, influence of optical defocus, and cataract extraction.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Parisi L; Brusini P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Nov; 48(11):5320-31. PubMed ID: 17962489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmologic disorders.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Apr; 113(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 7710398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The distribution of visual field defects per quadrant in standard automated perimetry as compared to frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Zein WM; Bashshur ZF; Jaafar RF; Noureddin BN
    Int Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 30(6):683-9. PubMed ID: 20924646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual loss in pseudotumor cerebri. Incidence and defects related to visual field strategy.
    Wall M; George D
    Arch Neurol; 1987 Feb; 44(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 3813933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perimetric findings in pseudotumor cerebri using automated techniques.
    Smith TJ; Baker RS
    Ophthalmology; 1986 Jul; 93(7):887-94. PubMed ID: 3763133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficiency of Rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of homonymous hemianopia in stroke patients.
    Gedik S; Akman A; Akova YA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Aug; 91(8):1065-9. PubMed ID: 17301122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optic nerve diameters and perimetric thresholds in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
    Salgarello T; Tamburrelli C; Falsini B; Giudiceandrea A; Colotto A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Jun; 80(6):509-14. PubMed ID: 8759260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rarebit perimetry and frequency doubling technology in patients with ocular hypertension.
    Corallo G; Iester M; Scotto R; Calabria G; Traverso CE
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 18320512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rarebit perimetry for bedside testing: comparison with standard automated perimetry.
    Steven Houston SK; Weber ED; Koga SF; Newman SA
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 30(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 20548245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of visual field testing in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
    Wall M
    Continuum (Minneap Minn); 2014 Aug; 20(4 Neuro-ophthalmology):1067-74. PubMed ID: 25099109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Automated perimetry in patients with primary congenital glaucoma].
    Lopes Filho JG; Betinjane AJ; Carvalho CA
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 17505716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flicker defined form and RareBit measurements lack in specificity of visual pathways.
    Szkudlarek-Wodzińska J; Przeździecka-Dołyk J; Fuchs O; Poznański Z; Misiuk-Hojło M
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 32309178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perimetry in young and neurologically impaired children: the Behavioral Visual Field (BEFIE) Screening Test revisited.
    Koenraads Y; Braun KP; van der Linden DC; Imhof SM; Porro GL
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 133(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 25541916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.