369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20306863)
1. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Wang XY; Zhang ZY; Ma XC; Li G
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries.
Pontual AA; de Melo DP; de Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN; Haiter Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 20841461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts.
Terry GL; Noujeim M; Langlais RP; Moore WS; Prihoda TJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150159. PubMed ID: 26869221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of proximal caries in vitro using standard and task-specific enhanced images from a storage phosphor plate system.
Li G; Sanderink GC; Berkhout WE; Syriopoulos K; van der Stelt PF
Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 17426405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observer differentiation of mechanical defects versus natural dental caries cavitations on monitor-displayed images with imaging plate readout.
Kang BC; Goldsmith LJ; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Nov; 86(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 9830655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A pilot study of a modified radiographic technique for detecting early proximal cavities.
Akbari M; Zarch HH; Movagharipour F; Ahrari F
Caries Res; 2013; 47(6):612-6. PubMed ID: 24061285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth.
Sogur E; Baksı BG; Orhan K; Paksoy SC; Dogan S; Erdal YS; Mert A
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 20838834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic detection of cavitation in approximal surfaces of primary teeth using a digital storage phosphor system and conventional film, and the relationship between cavitation and radiographic lesion depth: an in vitro study.
Nielsen LL; Hoernoe M; Wenzel A
Int J Paediatr Dent; 1996 Sep; 6(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 9115972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of proximal caries in conventional and digital radiographs: an in vitro study.
Rockenbach MI; Veeck EB; da Costa NP
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 19223710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands.
Reichl P; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8678348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
