781 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20307746)
1. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study.
Metzger Z; Teperovich E; Cohen R; Zary R; Paqué F; Hülsmann M
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 20307746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant.
Kaya S; Yiğit-Özer S; Adigüzel Ö
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation.
Salman MI; Baumann MA; Hellmich M; Roggendorf MJ; Termaat S
Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 20518928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.
Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars.
Paqué F; Al-Jadaa A; Kfir A
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 22188277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of the self-adjusting file system on cleaning and shaping oval canals: a microbiological and microscopic evaluation.
Paranjpe A; de Gregorio C; Gonzalez AM; Gomez A; Silva Herzog D; Piña AA; Cohenca N
J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 22244642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of different irrigant agitation techniques on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopy study.
Rödig T; Döllmann S; Konietschke F; Drebenstedt S; Hülsmann M
J Endod; 2010 Dec; 36(12):1983-7. PubMed ID: 21092817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Root canal debris removal using different irrigating needles: an SEM study.
Ghivari S; Kubasad G
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 22406709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of smear layer removal after use of a canal brush: an SEM study.
Garip Y; Sazak H; Gunday M; Hatipoglu S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e62-6. PubMed ID: 20573530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of a low-concentration EDTA solution on root canal walls: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Perez F; Rouqueyrol-Pourcel N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):383-7. PubMed ID: 15716850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SEM analysis of smear layer removal after manual and automated handpiece root canal preparation.
Sydney GB; Batista A; Estrela C; Pesce HF; de Melo LL
Braz Dent J; 1996; 7(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 9206350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of root canal taper on its cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Arvaniti IS; Khabbaz MG
J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):871-4. PubMed ID: 21787508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
