These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20307753)

  • 1. Distortion and breakage of Liberator, EndoSequence, and ProFile systems in severely curved roots of molars.
    Stewart JT; Lafkowitz S; Appelbaum K; Hartwell G
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):729-31. PubMed ID: 20307753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars.
    Ankrum MT; Hartwell GR; Truitt JE
    J Endod; 2004 Apr; 30(4):234-7. PubMed ID: 15085054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A scanning electron microscopy evaluation of microfractures, deformation and separation in EndoSequence and Profile nickel-titanium rotary files using an extracted molar tooth model.
    Herold KS; Johnson BR; Wenckus CS
    J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):712-4. PubMed ID: 17509412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of nickel-titanium file distortion using electric and air-driven handpieces.
    Bortnick KL; Steiman HR; Ruskin A
    J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 11487167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing canal transportation and centering ability of endosequence and vortex rotary files by using micro-computed tomography.
    Yamamura B; Cox TC; Heddaya B; Flake NM; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22794219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and profile GT, for canal-cleaning ability.
    Williamson AE; Sandor AJ; Justman BC
    J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 19084136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro comparison of torsional stress and cyclic fatigue resistance of ProFile GT and ProFile GT Series X rotary nickel-titanium files.
    Kramkowski TR; Bahcall J
    J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):404-7. PubMed ID: 19249605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of the variability of 0.06 tapered rotary endodontic files to current taper standards.
    Hatch GW; Roberts S; Joyce AP; Runner R; McPherson JC
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):463-5. PubMed ID: 18358898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cyclic fatigue analysis of a new generation of nickel titanium rotary instruments.
    Larsen CM; Watanabe I; Glickman GN; He J
    J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):401-3. PubMed ID: 19249604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture: a clinical practice assessment.
    Di Fiore PM; Genov KA; Komaroff E; Li Y; Lin L
    Int Endod J; 2006 Sep; 39(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 16916359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro comparison of torsional stress properties of three different rotary nickel-titanium files with a similar cross-sectional design.
    Wycoff RC; Berzins DW
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1118-20. PubMed ID: 22794218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals.
    Bahia MG; Buono VT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Aug; 100(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 16037784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals.
    Madureira RG; Forner Navarro L; Llena MC; Costa M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):e136-44. PubMed ID: 19969482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments in a simulated apical abrupt curvature.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Melo MC; Bahia MG; Testarelli L; Gambarini G
    Int Endod J; 2010 Mar; 43(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 20158534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.