These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20308052)

  • 1. Study on the response of thermoluminescent dosemeters to synchrotron radiation: experimental method and Monte Carlo calculations.
    Bakshi AK; Chatterjee S; Palani Selvam T; Dhabekar BS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jul; 140(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 20308052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo simulation and measurements of clinical photon beams using LiF:Mg,Cu,P+PTFE.
    Azorín-Vega C; Rivera-Montalvo T; Azorín-Nieto J; Villaseñor-Navarro L; Luján-Castilla P; Vega-Carrillo H
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):954-6. PubMed ID: 20093037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetry at the Portuguese research reactor using thermoluminescence measurements and Monte Carlo calculations.
    Fernandes AC; Gonçalves IC; Santos J; Cardoso J; Santos L; Ferro Carvalho A; Marques JG; Kling A; Ramalho AJ; Osvay M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):349-53. PubMed ID: 16702246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Energy response of LiF and Mg2SiO4 TLDs to 10-150 keV monoenergetic photons.
    Konnai A; Nariyama N; Ohnishi S; Odano N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):334-6. PubMed ID: 16381741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL efficiency for X-rays and their application to Monte Carlo simulations of dosemeter response.
    Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Olko P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):483-6. PubMed ID: 16822775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of doses calculated by the Monte Carlo method and measured by LiF TLD in the buildup region for a 60Co photon beam.
    Budanec M; Knezević Z; Bokulić T; Mrcela I; Vrtar M; Vekić B; Kusić Z
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Dec; 66(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 18541436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the energy-response factor of LiF and Al2O3 in radiotherapy beams.
    Mobit P; Agyingi E; Sandison G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):497-9. PubMed ID: 16735558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling the thermoluminescent response of CaSO4:Dy by the MCNPX method.
    Furetta C; Roman J; Rivera T; Azorín J; Azorín CG; Vega-Carrillo HR
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):967-9. PubMed ID: 20079655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulated and measured Hp(10) response of the personal dosemeter Seibersdorf.
    Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):166-9. PubMed ID: 17846027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose measurements in inhomogeneous bone/tissue and lung/tissue phantoms for angiography using synchrotron radiation.
    Nariyama N; Namito Y; Ban S; Hirayama H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Mar; 46(3):717-28. PubMed ID: 11277220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ENERGY RESPONSE FACTOR of BeO DOSEMETER CHIPS: A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND GENERAL CAVITY THEORY STUDY.
    Sarigul N; Surucu M; Aydogan B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(3):303-309. PubMed ID: 30806472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thermoluminescence dosimetry of a thermal neutron field and comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Fernandes AC; Santos JP; Kling A; Marques JG; Gonçalves IC; Carvalho AF; Santos L; Cardoso J; Osvay M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 15367765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
    Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
    Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Angular and radial dependence of the energy response factor for LIF-TLD micro-rods in 125L permanent implant source.
    Mobit P; Badragan I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):70-3. PubMed ID: 16782977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of QUADOS problem on TLD-ALBEDO personal dosemeter responses using discrete ordinates and Monte Carlo methods.
    Kodeli I; Tanner R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):542-7. PubMed ID: 16381782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the relationship between dose-, energy- and LET-response of thermoluminescent detectors.
    Olko P; Bilski P; El-Faramawy NA; Göksu HY; Kim JL; Kopec R; Waligórski MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):15-22. PubMed ID: 16644968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Personal monitor glass badge: theoretical dosemeter response calculated with the Monte Carlo transport code MCNPX.
    Hocine N; Donadille L; Huet C; Itié C; Clairand I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):231-3. PubMed ID: 21335330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calculated energy response correction factors for LiF thermoluminescent dosemeters employed in the seventh EULEP dosimetry intercomparison.
    Zoetelief J; Jansen JT
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Aug; 42(8):1491-504. PubMed ID: 9279901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The energy correction factor of LiF thermoluminescent dosemeters in megavoltage electron beams: Monte Carlo simulations and experiments.
    Mobit PN; Nahum AE; Mayles P
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Jun; 41(6):979-93. PubMed ID: 8794479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.