BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20308488)

  • 1. Pseudohelical scan for the dose profile measurements of 160-mm-wide cone-beam MDCT.
    Lin PJ; Herrnsdorf L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):897-902. PubMed ID: 20308488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dosimetry methods for multi-detector computed tomography.
    Gancheva M; Dyakov I; Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Taseva D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):190-3. PubMed ID: 25889607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of radiation doses between cone beam CT and multi detector CT: TLD measurements.
    Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Yoo S; Yin FF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 19074786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A practical approach to estimate the weighted CT dose index over an infinite integration length.
    Li X; Zhang D; Liu B
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(18):5789-803. PubMed ID: 21846935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concepts for dose determination in flat-detector CT.
    Kyriakou Y; Deak P; Langner O; Kalender WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3551-66. PubMed ID: 18552416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation dose assessment in a 320-detector-row CT scanner used in cardiac imaging.
    Gomà C; Ruiz A; Jornet N; Latorre A; Pallerol RM; Carrasco P; Eudaldo T; Ribas M
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1473-80. PubMed ID: 21520859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technical Note: Using linear and polynomial approximations to correct IEC CTDI measurements for a wide-beam CT scanner.
    Weir VJ; Zhang J
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5360-5365. PubMed ID: 31484208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose and image quality evaluation of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for high-contrast neurologic applications.
    Yu L; Vrieze TJ; Bruesewitz MR; Kofler JM; DeLone DR; Pallanch JF; Lindell EP; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):W193-201. PubMed ID: 20093573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose from cone beam CT in a pediatric phantom: risk estimation of cancer incidence.
    Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Frush DP; Toncheva G; Yin FF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):186-90. PubMed ID: 20028922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
    Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT.
    Nakonechny KD; Fallone BG; Rathee S
    Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 15719960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols.
    Hurwitz LM; Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Lowry C
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):544-9. PubMed ID: 17882029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated framework for digital radiation dose index reporting from CT dose reports.
    Shih G; Lu ZF; Zabih R; Kennedy D; Loftus M; Shih WJ; Osborne J; Nickoloff E; Schwartz L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1170-4. PubMed ID: 22021511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.
    Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed tomography dose assessment for a 160 mm wide, 320 detector row, cone beam CT scanner.
    Geleijns J; Salvadó Artells M; de Bruin PW; Matter R; Muramatsu Y; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(10):3141-59. PubMed ID: 19420423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of absorbed doses from paediatric cone-beam CT scans: MOSFET measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
    Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Frush DP; Yin FF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 19889800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional dose verification for intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the radiological physics centre head-and-neck phantom using optical computed tomography scans of ferrous xylenol-orange gel dosimeters.
    Babic S; Battista J; Jordan K
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1281-91. PubMed ID: 18313533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of MDCT radiation dose: a phantom study.
    Moore WH; Bonvento M; Olivieri-Fitt R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):W498-502. PubMed ID: 17056880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.