These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20308525)

  • 1. Recommendation for short-interval follow-up examinations after a probably benign assessment: is clinical practice consistent with BI-RADS guidance?
    Bowles EJ; Sickles EA; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Elmore JG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):1152-9. PubMed ID: 20308525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms.
    Lehman C; Holt S; Peacock S; White E; Urban N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12076896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.
    Baum JK; Hanna LG; Acharyya S; Mahoney MC; Conant EF; Bassett LW; Pisano ED
    Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21502382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance.
    Buist DS; Anderson ML; Smith RA; Carney PA; Miglioretti DL; Monsees BS; Sickles EA; Taplin SH; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Onega TL
    Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):351-64. PubMed ID: 24960110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency and Determinants of a Short-Interval Follow-up Recommendation After an Abnormal Screening Mammogram.
    Pelletier E; Daigle JM; Defay F; Major D; Guertin MH; Brisson J
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Nov; 67(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 27209218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding--short interval follow-up suggested".
    Caplan LS; Blackman D; Nadel M; Monticciolo DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 9930778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.
    Elmore JG; Taplin SH; Barlow WE; Cutter GR; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE; Abraham LA; Fosse JS; Carney PA
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 15987961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of short-interval follow-up mammograms by patient and radiologist characteristics.
    Aiello Bowles EJ; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Abraham L; Carney PA; Yankaskas BC; Elmore JG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1200-8. PubMed ID: 18430832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.
    Elmore JG; Jackson SL; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K; Onega T; Rosenberg RD; Sickles EA; Buist DS
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):641-51. PubMed ID: 19864507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are there racial/ethnic disparities among women younger than 40 undergoing mammography?
    Kapp JM; Walker R; Haneuse S; Buist DS; Yankaskas BC
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 20204501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast MRI BI-RADS assessments and abnormal interpretation rates by clinical indication in US community practices.
    Lee CI; Ichikawa L; Rochelle MC; Kerlikowske K; Miglioretti DL; Sprague BL; DeMartini WB; Wernli KJ; Joe BN; Yankaskas BC; Lehman CD
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1370-6. PubMed ID: 25126973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concordance of BI-RADS Assessments and Management Recommendations for Breast MRI in Community Practice.
    Lee AY; Ichikawa L; Lee JM; Lee CI; DeMartini WB; Joe BN; Wernli KJ; Sprague BL; Herschorn SD; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 26700354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
    Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Abraham LA; Lehman CD; Yankaskas BC; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Voeks JH; Geller BM; Carney PA; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 15734926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease.
    Geller BM; Barlow WE; Ballard-Barbash R; Ernster VL; Yankaskas BC; Sickles EA; Carney PA; Dignan MB; Rosenberg RD; Urban N; Zheng Y; Taplin SH
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 11818625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiologists' performance and their enjoyment of interpreting screening mammograms.
    Geller BM; Bowles EJ; Sohng HY; Brenner RJ; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Elmore JG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):361-9. PubMed ID: 19155395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient and Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Accuracy of Two Types of Diagnostic Mammograms.
    Jackson SL; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Onega T; Carney PA; Sickles EA; Elmore JG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 26204300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography.
    Miglioretti DL; Smith-Bindman R; Abraham L; Brenner RJ; Carney PA; Bowles EJ; Buist DS; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Dec; 99(24):1854-63. PubMed ID: 18073379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lesion and patient characteristics associated with malignancy after a probably benign finding on community practice mammography.
    Lehman CD; Rutter CM; Eby PR; White E; Buist DS; Taplin SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):511-5. PubMed ID: 18212240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive predictive value of mammography: comparison of interpretations of screening and diagnostic images by the same radiologist and by different radiologists.
    Halladay JR; Yankaskas BC; Bowling JM; Alexander C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):782-5. PubMed ID: 20729460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography.
    Carney PA; Abraham LA; Miglioretti DL; Yabroff KR; Sickles EA; Buist DS; Kasales CJ; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Dignan MB; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K;
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 17242246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.