These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20309540)
1. Single-cell analysis and isolation for microbiology and biotechnology: methods and applications. Ishii S; Tago K; Senoo K Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 May; 86(5):1281-92. PubMed ID: 20309540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond toothpicks: new methods for isolating mutant bacteria. Link AJ; Jeong KJ; Georgiou G Nat Rev Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 5(9):680-8. PubMed ID: 17676054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methods for the isolation of cellulose-degrading microorganisms. McDonald JE; Rooks DJ; McCarthy AJ Methods Enzymol; 2012; 510():349-74. PubMed ID: 22608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of flow cytometric methods for single-cell analysis in environmental microbiology. Czechowska K; Johnson DR; van der Meer JR Curr Opin Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 11(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 18562243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enumeration of airborne bacteria and fungi using solid phase cytometry. Vanhee LM; Nelis HJ; Coenye T J Microbiol Methods; 2008 Jan; 72(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 18054099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Droplet microfluidics for microbiology: techniques, applications and challenges. Kaminski TS; Scheler O; Garstecki P Lab Chip; 2016 Jun; 16(12):2168-87. PubMed ID: 27212581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An improved method for single cell isolation of prokaryotes from meso-, thermo- and hyperthermophilic environments using micromanipulation. Ishøy T; Kvist T; Westermann P; Ahring BK Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Jan; 69(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 16034558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods of studying soil microbial diversity. Kirk JL; Beaudette LA; Hart M; Moutoglis P; Klironomos JN; Lee H; Trevors JT J Microbiol Methods; 2004 Aug; 58(2):169-88. PubMed ID: 15234515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A survey of the methods for the characterization of microbial consortia and communities. Spiegelman D; Whissell G; Greer CW Can J Microbiol; 2005 May; 51(5):355-86. PubMed ID: 16088332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Isolation of functional single cells from environments using a micromanipulator: application to study denitrifying bacteria. Ashida N; Ishii S; Hayano S; Tago K; Tsuji T; Yoshimura Y; Otsuka S; Senoo K Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Jan; 85(4):1211-7. PubMed ID: 19936739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of methods used for aerobic mesophile count determination. Szita G; Takács J; Lendvai I Acta Vet Acad Sci Hung; 1981; 29(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7044074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Disposable bioreactors: the current state-of-the-art and recommended applications in biotechnology. Eibl R; Kaiser S; Lombriser R; Eibl D Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Mar; 86(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 20094714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Microbiological techniques--identification of bacteria and fungi by their biochemical characteristics]. Kawakami Y Rinsho Byori; 1997 Jul; Suppl 105():22-30. PubMed ID: 9379544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Microbiological studies of waters of the Alimini Lakes]. Montagna MT; Bagordo F; De Donno A; Carrozzini F Ann Ig; 1998; 10(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 9658670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of conventional detection and enumeration methods for pathogenic bacteria in food. Gracias KS; McKillip JL Can J Microbiol; 2004 Nov; 50(11):883-90. PubMed ID: 15644905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]