384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20309542)
1. Transcriptome shifts in response to furfural and acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Li BZ; Yuan YJ
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 May; 86(6):1915-24. PubMed ID: 20309542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transcriptional profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae T2 cells upon exposure to hardwood spent sulphite liquor: comparison to acetic acid, furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural.
Bajwa PK; Ho CY; Chan CK; Martin VJ; Trevors JT; Lee H
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2013 Jun; 103(6):1281-95. PubMed ID: 23539198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcriptome profiling of Zymomonas mobilis under furfural stress.
He MX; Wu B; Shui ZX; Hu QC; Wang WG; Tan FR; Tang XY; Zhu QL; Pan K; Li Q; Su XH
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Jul; 95(1):189-99. PubMed ID: 22592554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving Acetic Acid and Furfural Resistance of Xylose-Fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains by Regulating Novel Transcription Factors Revealed via Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis.
Li B; Wang L; Wu YJ; Xia ZY; Yang BX; Tang YQ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2021 Apr; 87(10):. PubMed ID: 33712428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tolerance to furfural-induced stress is associated with pentose phosphate pathway genes ZWF1, GND1, RPE1, and TKL1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Gorsich SW; Dien BS; Nichols NN; Slininger PJ; Liu ZL; Skory CD
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Jul; 71(3):339-49. PubMed ID: 16222531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Yeast genes involved in response to lactic acid and acetic acid: acidic conditions caused by the organic acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultures induce expression of intracellular metal metabolism genes regulated by Aft1p.
Kawahata M; Masaki K; Fujii T; Iefuji H
FEMS Yeast Res; 2006 Sep; 6(6):924-36. PubMed ID: 16911514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mediated electrochemical measurement of the inhibitory effects of furfural and acetic acid on Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida shehatae.
Zhao J; Wang M; Yang Z; Gong Q; Lu Y; Yang Z
Biotechnol Lett; 2005 Feb; 27(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 15717131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrated phospholipidomics and transcriptomics analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with enhanced tolerance to a mixture of acetic acid, furfural, and phenol.
Yang J; Ding MZ; Li BZ; Liu ZL; Wang X; Yuan YJ
OMICS; 2012; 16(7-8):374-86. PubMed ID: 22734833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deletion of the PHO13 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysate in the presence of acetic and formic acids, and furfural.
Fujitomi K; Sanda T; Hasunuma T; Kondo A
Bioresour Technol; 2012 May; 111():161-6. PubMed ID: 22357292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal quantitative proteomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to a nonlethal concentration of furfural.
Lin FM; Tan Y; Yuan YJ
Proteomics; 2009 Dec; 9(24):5471-83. PubMed ID: 19834894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transcriptome analysis of differential responses of diploid and haploid yeast to ethanol stress.
Li BZ; Cheng JS; Ding MZ; Yuan YJ
J Biotechnol; 2010 Aug; 148(4):194-203. PubMed ID: 20561546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metabolomic study of interactive effects of phenol, furfural, and acetic acid on Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Ding MZ; Wang X; Yang Y; Yuan YJ
OMICS; 2011 Oct; 15(10):647-53. PubMed ID: 21978393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response to different environmental stress conditions of industrial and laboratory Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
Garay-Arroyo A; Covarrubias AA; Clark I; Niño I; Gosset G; Martinez A
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 63(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 12910327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of transcriptional responses to saline stress in the laboratory and brewing strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with DNA microarray.
Hirasawa T; Nakakura Y; Yoshikawa K; Ashitani K; Nagahisa K; Furusawa C; Katakura Y; Shimizu H; Shioya S
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Apr; 70(3):346-57. PubMed ID: 16283296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Co-expression of TAL1 and ADH1 in recombinant xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates in the presence of furfural.
Hasunuma T; Ismail KSK; Nambu Y; Kondo A
J Biosci Bioeng; 2014 Feb; 117(2):165-169. PubMed ID: 23916856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Insertion of transposon in the vicinity of SSK2 confers enhanced tolerance to furfural in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Kim HS; Kim NR; Kim W; Choi W
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Jul; 95(2):531-40. PubMed ID: 22639140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative lipidomics of four strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals different responses to furfural, phenol, and acetic acid.
Xia JM; Yuan YJ
J Agric Food Chem; 2009 Jan; 57(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 19049411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds.
Keating JD; Panganiban C; Mansfield SD
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2006 Apr; 93(6):1196-206. PubMed ID: 16470880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploration of essential gene functions via titratable promoter alleles.
Mnaimneh S; Davierwala AP; Haynes J; Moffat J; Peng WT; Zhang W; Yang X; Pootoolal J; Chua G; Lopez A; Trochesset M; Morse D; Krogan NJ; Hiley SL; Li Z; Morris Q; Grigull J; Mitsakakis N; Roberts CJ; Greenblatt JF; Boone C; Kaiser CA; Andrews BJ; Hughes TR
Cell; 2004 Jul; 118(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 15242642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of carbon source perturbations on transcriptional regulation of metabolic fluxes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Cakir T; Kirdar B; Onsan ZI; Ulgen KO; Nielsen J
BMC Syst Biol; 2007 Mar; 1():18. PubMed ID: 17408508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
