BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20309756)

  • 1. Optimized ranking and selection methods for feature selection with application in microarray experiments.
    Cui X; Zhao H; Wilson J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):223-39. PubMed ID: 20309756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling microarray data using a threshold mixture model.
    Kauermann G; Eilers P
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):376-87. PubMed ID: 15180663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
    Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a statistical equivalence test applied to microarray data.
    Qiu J; Cui X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 20309757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of gene importance in microarray data based upon probability of selection.
    Fu LM; Fu-Liu CS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():67. PubMed ID: 15784140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the probability of correct selection for large k populations, with application to microarray data.
    Cui X; Wilson J
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):870-83. PubMed ID: 18932145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hierarchical gene selection and genetic fuzzy system for cancer microarray data classification.
    Nguyen T; Khosravi A; Creighton D; Nahavandi S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120364. PubMed ID: 25823003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical approach for selection of biologically informative genes.
    Das S; Rai A; Mishra DC; Rai SN
    Gene; 2018 May; 655():71-83. PubMed ID: 29458166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian ranking and selection methods using hierarchical mixture models in microarray studies.
    Noma H; Matsui S; Omori T; Sato T
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 19946026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intensity-based hierarchical Bayes method improves testing for differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Sartor MA; Tomlinson CR; Wesselkamper SC; Sivaganesan S; Leikauf GD; Medvedovic M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7():538. PubMed ID: 17177995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The exact probability distribution of the rank product statistics for replicated experiments.
    Eisinga R; Breitling R; Heskes T
    FEBS Lett; 2013 Mar; 587(6):677-82. PubMed ID: 23395607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kernel-imbedded Gaussian processes for disease classification using microarray gene expression data.
    Zhao X; Cheung LW
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 8():67. PubMed ID: 17328811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size calculation through the incorporation of heteroscedasticity and dependence for a penalized t-statistic in microarray experiments.
    Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):260-75. PubMed ID: 22251173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CLIFF: clustering of high-dimensional microarray data via iterative feature filtering using normalized cuts.
    Xing EP; Karp RM
    Bioinformatics; 2001; 17 Suppl 1():S306-15. PubMed ID: 11473022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonparametric methods for microarray data based on exchangeability and borrowed power.
    Lee ML; Whitmore GA; Björkbacka H; Freeman MW
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):783-97. PubMed ID: 16078385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A unified framework for finding differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments.
    Shaik JS; Yeasin M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():347. PubMed ID: 17877806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Entropy-based gene ranking without selection bias for the predictive classification of microarray data.
    Furlanello C; Serafini M; Merler S; Jurman G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 4():54. PubMed ID: 14604446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved gene selection for classification of microarrays.
    Jaeger J; Sengupta R; Ruzzo WL
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2003; ():53-64. PubMed ID: 12603017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical analysis of microarray data: a Bayesian approach.
    Gottardo R; Pannucci JA; Kuske CR; Brettin T
    Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):597-620. PubMed ID: 14557114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.