BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2030980)

  • 1. A simple method for the isolation of chromosomal DNA from gram positive or acid-fast bacteria.
    Bollet C; Gevaudan MJ; de Lamballerie X; Zandotti C; de Micco P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1991 Apr; 19(8):1955. PubMed ID: 2030980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A rapid procedure for isolating chromosomal DNA from Lactobacillus species and other Gram-positive bacteria.
    Ulrich RL; Hughes TA
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 11169042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An improved method for the isolation of chromosomal DNA from various bacteria and cyanobacteria.
    Mak YM; Ho KK
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1992 Aug; 20(15):4101-2. PubMed ID: 1508700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extremely rapid extraction of DNA from bacteria and yeasts.
    Cheng HR; Jiang N
    Biotechnol Lett; 2006 Jan; 28(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 16369876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chromosomal constraints in Gram-positive bacteria revealed by artificial inversions.
    Campo N; Dias MJ; Daveran-Mingot ML; Ritzenthaler P; Le Bourgeois P
    Mol Microbiol; 2004 Jan; 51(2):511-22. PubMed ID: 14756790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple and rapid method for preparing genomic DNA from gram-positive bacteria.
    Sohail M
    Mol Biotechnol; 1998 Oct; 10(2):191-3. PubMed ID: 9819818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [One method for isolation of the DNA-containing shells from vegetative and resting bacterial cells for their efficient detection by PCR].
    Muliukin AL; Suzina NE; El'-Registan GI; Danilevich VN
    Mikrobiologiia; 2013; 82(3):300-11. PubMed ID: 24466732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Isolation of bacterial DNA followed by sequencing and differing cytokine response in peritoneal dialysis effluent help in identifying bacteria in culture negative peritonitis.
    Prasad N; Singh K; Gupta A; Prasad KN
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2018 Feb; 23(2):148-154. PubMed ID: 27859980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential application of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for extraction of bacterial genomic DNA from contaminated food and environmental samples.
    Basu S; Chatterjee S; Bandyopadhyay A; Sarkar K
    J Sci Food Agric; 2013 Mar; 93(4):788-93. PubMed ID: 22806888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection and characterization of a promoter for expression of single-copy recombinant genes in Gram-positive bacteria.
    Provvedi R; Maggi T; Oggioni MR; Manganelli R; Pozzi G
    BMC Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 5():3. PubMed ID: 15651989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic DNA isolation from different biological materials.
    Park D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 353():3-13. PubMed ID: 17332629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved detection of microbial DNA after bead-beating before DNA isolation.
    de Boer R; Peters R; Gierveld S; Schuurman T; Kooistra-Smid M; Savelkoul P
    J Microbiol Methods; 2010 Feb; 80(2):209-11. PubMed ID: 19995580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A rapid chemical procedure for isolation and purification of chromosomal DNA from gram-negative bacilli.
    Beji A; Izard D; Gavini F; Leclerc H; Leseine-Delstanche M; Krembel J
    Anal Biochem; 1987 Apr; 162(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 3605586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Isolation and identification of culturable halophilic bacteria with producing hydrolytic enzyme from Incheh Broun hypersaline wetland in Iran.
    Zarparvar P; Amoozegar MA; Babavalian H; Reza Fallahian M; Tebyanian H; Shakeri F
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2016 Oct; 62(12):31-36. PubMed ID: 27894397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simple broad-spectrum protocol using labiase for bacterial cell lysis to prepare genomic DNA for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis.
    Oana K; Kawakami Y; Hayashi T; Ohnishi M
    Microbiol Immunol; 2009 Jan; 53(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 19161557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Isolation of stable bacterial artificial chromosome DNA using a modified alkaline lysis method.
    Sinnett D; Richer C; Baccichet A
    Biotechniques; 1998 May; 24(5):752-4. PubMed ID: 9591122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A chimeric vector for efficient chromosomal modification in Enterococcus faecalis and other lactic acid bacteria.
    Blancato VS; Magni C
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2010 May; 50(5):542-6. PubMed ID: 20158606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Miniaturized bead-beating device to automate full DNA sample preparation processes for gram-positive bacteria.
    Hwang KY; Kwon SH; Jung SO; Lim HK; Jung WJ; Park CS; Kim JH; Suh KY; Huh N
    Lab Chip; 2011 Nov; 11(21):3649-55. PubMed ID: 21918771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Construction of plasmid vectors for screening replicons from gram-positive bacteria and their use as shuttle cloning vectors.
    Benachour A; Auffray Y; Hartke A
    Curr Microbiol; 2007 May; 54(5):342-7. PubMed ID: 17486410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive selection, cloning vectors for gram-positive bacteria based on a restriction endonuclease cassette.
    Djordjevic GM; Klaenhammer TR
    Plasmid; 1996 Jan; 35(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 8693025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.