These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2031767)

  • 1. Assessment of the performance of general practitioners by the use of standardized (simulated) patients.
    Rethans JJ; Sturmans F; Drop R; van der Vleuten C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Mar; 41(344):97-9. PubMed ID: 2031767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for introducing standardized (simulated) patients into general practice consultations.
    Rethans JJ; Drop R; Sturmans F; van der Vleuten C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Mar; 41(344):94-6. PubMed ID: 2031766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To what extent do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients.
    Rethans JJ; Martin E; Metsemakers J
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Apr; 44(381):153-6. PubMed ID: 8185988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of quality assurance and medical audit: general practitioners' perceived obstacles and requirements.
    Grol R; Wensing M
    Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Oct; 45(399):548-52. PubMed ID: 7492425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards.
    Grol R
    Br J Gen Pract; 1990 Sep; 40(338):361-4. PubMed ID: 2265001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Standardized patients in general practice--a new method for quality assurance in Noway].
    Saebø L; Rethans JJ; Johannessen T; Westin S
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Oct; 115(25):3117-9. PubMed ID: 8539691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do we need USPs?
    Halperin M
    Aust Fam Physician; 2005 Oct; 34(10):882-4. PubMed ID: 16217579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
    McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a clinical audit to promote the quality use of medicines to rural and remote general practitioners.
    Cutts C
    Aust J Rural Health; 2001 Dec; 9 Suppl 1():S49-53. PubMed ID: 11998277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the effectiveness of 2 educational interventions in family practice.
    Borgiel AE; Williams JI; Davis DA; Dunn EV; Hobbs N; Hutchison B; Wilson CR; Jensen J; O'Neil JJ; Bass MJ
    CMAJ; 1999 Oct; 161(8):965-70. PubMed ID: 10551192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of the process of care. Experiences from The Netherlands and Canada.
    Steven ID
    Aust Fam Physician; 1990 Mar; 19(3):283-5. PubMed ID: 2334338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Criterion validity of responses to patient vignettes: an analysis based on management of female urinary incontinence.
    Sandvik H
    Fam Med; 1995 Jun; 27(6):388-92. PubMed ID: 7665027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Setting standards of prescribing performance in primary care: use of a consensus group of general practitioners and application of standards to practices in the north of England.
    Bateman DN; Eccles M; Campbell M; Soutter J; Roberts SJ; Smith JM
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Jan; 46(402):20-5. PubMed ID: 8745847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does competence of general practitioners predict their performance? Comparison between examination setting and actual practice.
    Rethans JJ; Sturmans F; Drop R; van der Vleuten C; Hobus P
    BMJ; 1991 Nov; 303(6814):1377-80. PubMed ID: 1760606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential of using simulated patients to study the performance of general practitioners.
    Kinnersley P; Pill R
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Jul; 43(372):297-300. PubMed ID: 8398247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing clinical judgment with standardized patients.
    McClure CL; Gall EP; Meredith KE; Gooden MA; Boyer JT
    J Fam Pract; 1985 May; 20(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 3872926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationships of physician characteristics to performance quality and improvement.
    Payne BC; Lyons TF; Neuhaus E
    Health Serv Res; 1984 Aug; 19(3):307-32. PubMed ID: 6746295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of care in general practice and a fixed denominator.
    Rutten G
    Gesundheitswesen; 1993 Feb; 55(1 Suppl):22-5. PubMed ID: 8467123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative assessment of the quality of medical care provided in five family practices before and after attachment of a family practice nurse.
    Chambers LW; Burke M; Ross J; Cantwell R
    Can Med Assoc J; 1978 May; 118(9):1060-4. PubMed ID: 647590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using referral letters to measure quality and performance in general practice.
    Montalto M
    J Qual Clin Pract; 1995 Mar; 15(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 7757325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.