These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2031798)

  • 1. Transfemoral digital subtraction aortography. Are diluted high osmolar contrast media acceptable?
    Naisby GP; Owen JP; Alexander TW; Cope L; Laker MF; Hamilton PJ
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 2031798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nephrotoxicity of high and low osmolar contrast media: case control studies following digital subtraction angiography in potential risk patients.
    Scherberich JE; Fischer A; Rautschka E; Kollath J; Riemann H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():91-4. PubMed ID: 2568816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Hemodynamic effects of non-ionic iomeprol 350 and ionic diatrizoate 370 during levocardiography and coronary angiography--double-blind randomized comparison of 2 contrast media].
    Lins M; Röhling D; Zahorsky R; Höfig M; Herrmann G; Simon R
    Z Kardiol; 1994 Sep; 83(9):626-33. PubMed ID: 7801664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cardiac complications of intravenous digital angiography. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media].
    Stacul F; Marass P; Pozzi Mucelli R; Predonzan F; Magnaldi S; Abbona M
    Radiol Med; 1985; 71(1-2):40-3. PubMed ID: 4023305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence of fibrillation with isotonic contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
    Morris TW; Hayakawa K; Sahler LG; Ekholm S
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3522039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Contrast media in venous digital angiography: ionic or non-ionic?].
    Stacul F; Magnaldi S; Pozzi-Mucelli R; Muner G; Dalla Palma L
    Radiol Med; 1986 Nov; 72(11):815-22. PubMed ID: 3786845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Urography and renal clearance of contrast media. A randomized comparison of an ionic high-osmolar and a non-ionic low-osmolar contrast medium].
    Vestergaard AS; Thomsen HS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Jan; 152(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 2405555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast agent nephrotoxicity: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Stacul F; Carraro M; Magnaldi S; Faccini L; Guarnieri G; Dalla Palma L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1287-9. PubMed ID: 2891285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparative evaluation of 2 non-ionic contrast media, iopentol (350 mgI/ml) and iopamidol (370 mgI/ml) in coronary angiography].
    Maddestra N; Di Cesare A; Salute L; Toppetti A; Minguzzi P; Marelli C; Bonomo L
    Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 7997610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delayed vs. immediate adverse reactions to ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast media.
    Oi H; Yamazaki H; Matsushita M
    Radiat Med; 1997; 15(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9134581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of contrast media osmolality on intravenous urographic quality.
    Lovett I; Benn I; Benness G; Doust B
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():105-7. PubMed ID: 2568775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nephrotoxicity of nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast media: a prospective double-blind randomized comparison in human beings.
    Katholi RE; Taylor GJ; Woods WT; Womack KA; Katholi CR; McCann WP; Moses HW; Dove JT; Mikell FL; Woodruff RC
    Radiology; 1993 Jan; 186(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 8416561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metrizamide in experimental urography. IV. Effects of bilateral ureteric stasis on urine iodine concentration after intravenous infection of an ionic and a non-ionic contrast medium.
    Golman K; Scient C; Almén T; Förste H
    Invest Radiol; 1976; 11(2):80-7. PubMed ID: 1262184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nephrotoxicity from contrast media: attenuation with theophylline.
    Katholi RE; Taylor GJ; McCann WP; Woods WT; Womack KA; McCoy CD; Katholi CR; Moses HW; Mishkel GJ; Lucore CL
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 7892462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Excretion of contrast media by the immature rabbit. Comparison of Renografin and Iopamidol.
    Rosenbaum DM; Caldicott WJ
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 6533102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Femoral artery flow and pain during lumbar aortography: comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media.
    Padayachee TS; Reidy JF; King DH; Reeves M; Gosling RG
    Clin Radiol; 1983 Jan; 34(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 6822042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The haemodynamic side-effects of ionic and non-ionic contrast media in the presence of pulmonary hypertension: experimental and clinical investigation.
    Schräder R; Hellige G; Kaltenbach M; Kober G
    Eur Heart J; 1987 Dec; 8(12):1322-31. PubMed ID: 3436330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental urography in dogs: diagnostic quality and pharmacokinetic behavior of iotrolan in comparison to nonionic and ionic, monomeric contrast media.
    Nauert C; Mützel W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():82-7. PubMed ID: 2568814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of renal and hepatic impairment by ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Langer M; Langer R; Felix R; Speck U; Behrends B; Mützel W
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Sep; 25 Suppl 1():S125-6. PubMed ID: 2283230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [In vivo biochemical aspects of adverse reactions of contrast media--sequential changes of histamine, cyclic AMP, cyclic GMP].
    Kuwatsuru R
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 May; 50(5):477-89. PubMed ID: 2167463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.