These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2031890)
21. Families created by gamete donation: follow-up at age 2. Golombok S; Jadva V; Lycett E; Murray C; Maccallum F Hum Reprod; 2005 Jan; 20(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 15539442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mum's the word: donor anonymity in assisted reproduction. Johnston J Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15739318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States. Stenger RL J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Gamete donation and anonymity: should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents? McWhinnie A Hum Reprod; 2001 May; 16(5):807-17. PubMed ID: 11331622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Law No. 35/1988 of 22 Nov 1988 on Assisted Reproduction Procedures (BoletÃn Oficial del Estado, 24 Nov 1988, No. 282, pp. 33373-33378). Spain Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 11659178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Regulating "the artificial family": an Austrian compromise. Bernat E J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 11651382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: a follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment. Fielding D; Handley S; Duqueno L; Weaver S; Lui S J Community Appl Soc Psychol; 1998; 8(4):273-87. PubMed ID: 15452938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Current European laws on gamete donation. Hum Reprod; 1998 May; 13 Suppl 2():105-34. PubMed ID: 9665331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Ethical considerations in contemporary reproductive technologies. Francis GR; Nosek JA J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 1988 Jan; 1(3):37-48. PubMed ID: 3288752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Only an attitude away: the potential of reproductive surrogacy. Sandberg EC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jun; 160(6):1441-6. PubMed ID: 2660571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Donor Conception and "Passing," or; Why Australian Parents of Donor-Conceived Children Want Donors Who Look Like Them. Wong KA J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Mar; 14(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 28108866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law. Wadlington W Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Civil law regulation of reproductive technologies: new laws for the new biology? Bercovitch J Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):385-406. PubMed ID: 11651095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. New birth technologies: a social work approach to researching the psychosocial factors. Daniels KR Soc Work Health Care; 1986; 11(4):49-60. PubMed ID: 3775614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Genetic databases and the future of donor anonymity. Pennings G Hum Reprod; 2019 May; 34(5):786-790. PubMed ID: 30927426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]