These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2032257)

  • 1. Enhancing early breast cancer screening: an expanded role for mammography facilities is needed.
    Gregorio DI; Kegeles S; Parker C; Benn S
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1991; 15(2):151-3. PubMed ID: 2032257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography in Connecticut: current estimates of capacity and usage.
    Gregorio DI; Kegeles S; Parker C; Benn S
    Conn Med; 1990 Jul; 54(7):367-9. PubMed ID: 2394095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
    Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of a mailed intervention on annual mammography and physician breast examinations among women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Richardson JL; Mondrus GT; Danley K; Deapen D; Mack T
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jan; 5(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 8770470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Progress in breast cancer screening: Vermont's efforts.
    Carney JK; Ewing JF; Finley CA
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 1996; 2(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 10186669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A mammogram coupon program: a collaborative effort to provide mammograms to uninsured women in Connecticut.
    Parker CB; Simpson J; McCooey LS
    Conn Med; 1995 Aug; 59(8):451-4. PubMed ID: 7554898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women.
    Paskett ED; Tatum CM; Mack DW; Hoen H; Case LD; Velez R
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Sep; 5(9):721-6. PubMed ID: 8877064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving compliance with breast cancer screening in older women. Results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Herman CJ; Speroff T; Cebul RD
    Arch Intern Med; 1995 Apr; 155(7):717-22. PubMed ID: 7695460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of mammography in screening for breast cancer.
    Sierra AE; Potchen EJ
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1990 Dec; 17(4):927-38. PubMed ID: 2092250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer screening in two multicultural family practice teaching clinics.
    Lubish L; Greenberg S; Friger M; Shvartzman P
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Aug; 3(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 11519382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ongoing physician guidance to achieve periodic mammography of women at an urban health center.
    Gregorio DI; Nestler EO; Gould B; Paturzo D
    Conn Med; 1998 Apr; 62(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 9611419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening mammography: factors associated with adherence to recommended age/frequency guidelines.
    Hitchcock JL; Steckevicz MJ; Thompson WD
    Womens Health; 1995; 1(3):221-35. PubMed ID: 9373381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
    Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Secondary prevention: screening for breast cancer.
    Chamberlain J
    Eff Health Care; 1985; 2(5):179-88. PubMed ID: 10271344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Method of discovery of breast cancer.
    Benedict S; Williams RD; Hoomani J
    Cancer Pract; 1996; 4(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 8826143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Profile of the breast center: one year's experience.
    Miller AP; Wilson AT; Henry S; Coffman CA; Guy JF
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1988; 278():243-6. PubMed ID: 3211941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening mammography in the Tampa Bay area: current status and implications for the next decade.
    Clark RA; King PS; Cox CE; Bromley J; Mauer K
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1989 May; 76(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 2614349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The control of breast cancer through mammography screening. What is the evidence?
    Tabár L; Dean PB
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):993-1005. PubMed ID: 3306777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.