These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2032319)
1. Laboratory process specifications for assuring quality in the U.S. National Cholesterol Education Program. Westgard JO; Petersen PH; Wiebe DA Clin Chem; 1991 May; 37(5):656-61. PubMed ID: 2032319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cholesterol operational process specifications for assuring the quality required by CLIA proficiency testing. Westgard JO; Wiebe DA Clin Chem; 1991 Nov; 37(11):1938-44. PubMed ID: 1934469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of NCEP performance specifications for triglycerides, HDL-, and LDL-cholesterol with operating specifications based on NCEP clinical and analytical goals. Fallest-Strobl PC; Olafsdottir E; Wiebe DA; Westgard JO Clin Chem; 1997 Nov; 43(11):2164-8. PubMed ID: 9365403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of current National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines for total cholesterol triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol measurements. Caudill SP; Cooper GR; Smith SJ; Myers GL Clin Chem; 1998 Aug; 44(8 Pt 1):1650-8. PubMed ID: 9702951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laboratory precision performance: state of the art versus operating specifications that assure the analytical quality required by clinical laboratory improvement amendments proficiency testing. Westgard JO; Bawa N; Ross JW; Lawson NS Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jul; 120(7):621-5. PubMed ID: 8757464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. European specifications for imprecision and inaccuracy compared with operating specifications that assure the quality required by US CLIA proficiency-testing criteria. Westgard JO; Seehafer JJ; Barry PL Clin Chem; 1994 Jul; 40(7 Pt 1):1228-32. PubMed ID: 8013091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cholesterol--a model system to relate medical needs with analytical performance. Wiebe DA; Westgard JO Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1504-12; discussion 1512-3. PubMed ID: 8330412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combination of analytical quality specifications based on biological within- and between-subject variation. Petersen PH; Fraser CG; Jørgensen L; Brandslund I; Stahl M; Gowans E; Libeer JC; Ricós C Ann Clin Biochem; 2002 Nov; 39(Pt 6):543-50. PubMed ID: 12564835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analytical quality goals and assessment to ensure transferability of laboratory results. Groth T; de Verdier CH Clin Chim Acta; 1993 Dec; 222(1-2):129-39. PubMed ID: 8168253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implementing the Stockholm Conference hierarchy of objective quality criteria in a routine laboratory. Dhatt GS; Agarwal MM; Bishawi B; Gill J Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(4):549-52. PubMed ID: 17439337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analytical quality specifications for serum lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme 1 based on clinical goals. von Eyben FE; Petersen PH; Blaabjerg O; Madsen EL Clin Chem Lab Med; 1999 May; 37(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 10418747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can current analytical quality performance of UK clinical laboratories support evidence-based guidelines for diabetes and ischaemic heart disease?--A pilot study and a proposal. Jassam N; Yundt-Pacheco J; Jansen R; Thomas A; Barth JH Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Aug; 51(8):1579-84. PubMed ID: 23525878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assuring analytical quality through process planning and quality control. Westgard JO Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Jul; 116(7):765-9. PubMed ID: 1497451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical need for quality specifications--a NORDKEM project for selecting the appropriate quality in clinical laboratories. de Verdier CH; Groth T; Hyltoft Petersen P Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1993; 215():29-37. PubMed ID: 8327849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Median of patient results as a tool for assessment of analytical stability. Jørgensen LM; Hansen SI; Petersen PH; Sölétormos G Clin Chim Acta; 2015 Jun; 446():186-91. PubMed ID: 25920692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analytic and clinical performance of two compact cholesterol-testing devices. Volles DF; McKenney JM; Miller WG; Ruffen D; Zhang D Pharmacotherapy; 1998; 18(1):184-92. PubMed ID: 9469692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analytical Performance Verification of the Beckman Coulter AU5800 Clinical Chemistry Analyser Against Recognized Quality Specifications Reveals Relevance of Method Harmonization. Glibert B; Bourleaux V; Peeters R; Reynolds T; Vranken G Clin Lab; 2016; 62(1-2):57-72. PubMed ID: 27012034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regional interlaboratory standardization of determinations of cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides. Tetrault GA; Miller WG; Chinchilli VM Clin Chem; 1990 Jan; 36(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 2297908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Allowable imprecision for laboratory tests based on clinical and analytical test outcome criteria. Westgard JO; Seehafer JJ; Barry PL Clin Chem; 1994 Oct; 40(10):1909-14. PubMed ID: 7923771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The truth about quality: medical usefulness and analytical reliability of laboratory tests. Westgard JO; Darcy T Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15234630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]