These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2032567)

  • 1. Vertical skeletal change associated with Andresen, Harvold, and Begg treatment.
    Ball JV; Hunt NP
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 13(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2032567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of Andresen, Harvold, and Begg treatment on overbite and molar eruption.
    Ball JV; Hunt NP
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 13(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 2032568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stability of the lower labial segment following orthodontic treatment--a comparison of treatment with Andresen and Begg appliances.
    Sims AP; Springate SD
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 7786861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
    Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of tensor analysis to investigate facial changes in treated class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Feb; 18(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 8746176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the vertical holding appliance in treatment of high-angle patients.
    Deberardinis M; Stretesky T; Sinha P; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):700-5. PubMed ID: 10842113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. First premolar extractions and fixed appliances in the Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Carter NE
    Br J Orthod; 1988 Feb; 15(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3164207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 1--Skeletal changes.
    Derringer K
    Br J Orthod; 1990 Feb; 17(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 2310738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of functional appliances on the skeletal pattern.
    Mills JR
    Br J Orthod; 1991 Nov; 18(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 1838280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation.
    Cura N; Saraç M
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 9458602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric evaluation of dento-skeletal changes during treatment with the Bionator type 1.
    Carels C; Reychler A; van der Linden FP
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Nov; 24(11):841-8. PubMed ID: 9426166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of two contrasting forms of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile.
    Looi LK; Mills JR
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Jun; 89(6):507-17. PubMed ID: 3459364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
    Pancherz H; Malmgren O; Hägg U; Omblus J; Hansen K
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of three methods of orthodontic appliance therapy on some commonly used cephalometric angular variables.
    Knight H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Mar; 93(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 3422780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Associations between changes in selected facial dimensions and the outcome of orthodontic treatment.
    Webster T; Harkness M; Herbison P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jul; 110(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 8686677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An assessment of Andresen therapy on class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Calvert FJ
    Br J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 9(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 6954989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skeletal changes during the treatment of Class II/I malocclusions.
    Cohen AM
    Br J Orthod; 1983 Jul; 10(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 6575823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.