These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2032568)

  • 1. The effect of Andresen, Harvold, and Begg treatment on overbite and molar eruption.
    Ball JV; Hunt NP
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 13(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 2032568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vertical skeletal change associated with Andresen, Harvold, and Begg treatment.
    Ball JV; Hunt NP
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 13(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2032567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stability of the lower labial segment following orthodontic treatment--a comparison of treatment with Andresen and Begg appliances.
    Sims AP; Springate SD
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 7786861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An assessment of Andresen therapy on class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Calvert FJ
    Br J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 9(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 6954989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 2--Dentoalveolar changes.
    Derringer K
    Br J Orthod; 1990 May; 17(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 2357464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.
    Bendeus M; Hägg U; Rabie B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study.
    Aras A; Cinsar A; Bulut H
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term stability of Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at end of active treatment.
    Fidler BC; Artun J; Joondeph DR; Little RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 7879760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances.
    Neves LS; Janson G; Cançado RH; de Lima KJ; Fernandes TM; Henriques JF
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):54. PubMed ID: 25182030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
    Martin J; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of two contrasting forms of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile.
    Looi LK; Mills JR
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Jun; 89(6):507-17. PubMed ID: 3459364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simplifying the approach of open bite treatment with aligners and selective micro-osteoperforations: An adult case report.
    Greco M; Rossini G; Rombolà A
    Int Orthod; 2021 Mar; 19(1):159-169. PubMed ID: 33358878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A retrospective cephalometric evaluation of dental changes with activator and activator headgear combination in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Lall R; Kumar GA; Maheshwari A; Kumar M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 22186684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skeletal and dental changes following the use of the Frankel functional regulator.
    Rushforth CD; Gordon PH; Aird JC
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 26(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 10420247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.