These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2032824)

  • 1. Blurred-mask density compression for improved reproduction of radiographs.
    Bednarek DR; Rudin S
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Apr; 26(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 2032824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photographic unsharp masking in chest radiography.
    Sorenson JA; Niklason LT; Nelson JA
    Invest Radiol; 1981; 16(4):281-8. PubMed ID: 7275540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced image mammography.
    McSweeney MB; Sprawls P; Egan RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Jan; 140(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 6336871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal subtraction in chest radiography: automated assessment of registration accuracy.
    Armato SG; Doshi DJ; Engelmann R; Croteau CL; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1239-49. PubMed ID: 16752558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contralateral subtraction: a novel technique for detection of asymmetric abnormalities on digital chest radiographs.
    Li Q; Katsuragawa S; Ishida T; Yoshida H; Tsukuda S; MacMahon H; Doi K
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 10659737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancement of radiographs used for publication.
    Flaxman NA; Kattan K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Nov; 56(5):551-4. PubMed ID: 6580601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the quality of temporal subtraction images obtained with manual and automated methods of digital chest radiography.
    Katsuragawa S; Tagashira H; Li Q; MacMahon H; Doi K
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Nov; 12(4):166-72. PubMed ID: 10587911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of temporal subtraction for detection of interval changes on chest radiographs: improvement of subtraction images using automated initial image matching.
    Ishida T; Ashizawa K; Engelmann R; Katsuragawa S; MacMahon H; Doi K
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 10342250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of an automated adaptive unsharp masking technique in digital chest radiographs].
    Abe K; Katsuragawa S; Sasaki Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Feb; 52(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 1561056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A fully automated adaptive unsharp masking technique in digital chest radiograph.
    Abe K; Katsuragawa S; Sasaki Y; Yanagisawa T
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Jan; 27(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 1733884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved contralateral subtraction images by use of elastic matching technique.
    Li Q; Katsuragawa S; Doi K
    Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1934-42. PubMed ID: 10984239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image-processing technique for suppressing ribs in chest radiographs by means of massive training artificial neural network (MTANN).
    Suzuki K; Abe H; MacMahon H; Doi K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Apr; 25(4):406-16. PubMed ID: 16608057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-shot dual-energy subtraction chest imaging with computed radiography: clinical evaluation of film images.
    Ishigaki T; Sakuma S; Ikeda M
    Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 3289096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital chest radiography: effect of temporal subtraction images on detection accuracy.
    Difazio MC; MacMahon H; Xu XW; Tsai P; Shiraishi J; Armato SG; Doi K
    Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 9015072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Luminance range compression for video film digitizers.
    Bednarek DR; Rudin S; Wong R
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 2046605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of irreversible compression of digitized posterior-anterior chest radiographs.
    Erickson BJ; Manduca A; Persons KR; Earnest F; Hartman TE; Harms GF; Brown LR
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3):97-102. PubMed ID: 9268903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation.
    Slone RM; Foos DH; Whiting BR; Muka E; Rubin DA; Pilgram TK; Kohm KS; Young SS; Ho P; Hendrickson DD
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):543-53. PubMed ID: 10796938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiological image compression using full-frame cosine transform with adaptive bit-allocation.
    Chan KK; Lou SL; Huang HK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1989; 13(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 2649229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
    Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.