These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20329690)

  • 1. Assessment of two emergency contraceptive regimens in Iran: levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe.
    Farajkhoda T; Khoshbin A; Enjezab B; Bokaei M; Karimi Zarchi M
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 12(4):450-2. PubMed ID: 20329690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Levonorgestrel versus the "Yuzpe" regimen. New choices in emergency contraception.
    Lee SM; Dunn S; Evans MF
    Can Fam Physician; 1999 Mar; 45():629-31. PubMed ID: 10099801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized clinical trial of two emergency contraceptive pill regimens in a Ugandan population.
    Byamugisha JK; Mirembe FM; Faxelid E; Tumwesigye NM; Gemzell-Danielsson K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):670-6. PubMed ID: 20423278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Levonorgestrel is more effective, has fewer side-effects, than Yuzpe regimen.
    Prog Hum Reprod Res; 1999; (51):3-5. PubMed ID: 12349416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postcoital contraception: present and future options.
    Derman SG; Peralta LM
    J Adolesc Health; 1995 Jan; 16(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 7742340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expanding access to emergency contraception in developing countries.
    Ellertson C; Winikoff B; Armstrong E; Camp S; Senanayake P
    Stud Fam Plann; 1995; 26(5):251-63. PubMed ID: 8571440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bioavailability of the Yuzpe and levonorgestrel regimens of emergency contraception: vaginal vs. oral administration.
    Kives S; Hahn PM; White E; Stanczyk FZ; Reid RL
    Contraception; 2005 Mar; 71(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 15722070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population-based evaluation of the effectiveness of two regimens for emergency contraception.
    Leung VW; Soon JA; Lynd LD; Marra CA; Levine M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):342-6. PubMed ID: 26969148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interventions for emergency contraception.
    Shen J; Che Y; Showell E; Chen K; Cheng L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD001324. PubMed ID: 28766313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interventions for emergency contraception.
    Shen J; Che Y; Showell E; Chen K; Cheng L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 1(1):CD001324. PubMed ID: 30661244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation.
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9126):428-33. PubMed ID: 9708750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring and reporting of the treatment effect of hormonal emergency contraceptives.
    Leung VW; Soon JA; Levine M
    Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Mar; 32(3):210-21. PubMed ID: 22392454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Yuzpe regimen, danazol, and mifepristone (RU486) in oral postcoital contraception.
    Webb AM; Russell J; Elstein M
    BMJ; 1992 Oct; 305(6859):927-31. PubMed ID: 1458074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interventions for emergency contraception.
    Cheng L; Gülmezoglu AM; Oel CJ; Piaggio G; Ezcurra E; Look PF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD001324. PubMed ID: 15266446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developments and challenges in emergency contraception.
    Black KI
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 19211308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined oral contraceptives versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception.
    Strayer SM; Couchenour RL
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Dec; 47(6):417. PubMed ID: 9866661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between monophasic levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol 150/30 and triphasic levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol 50-75-125/30-40-30 contraceptive pills for side effects and patient satisfaction: a study in Iran.
    Kashanian M; Shahpourian F; Zare O
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 20185226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized trial to compare 24 h versus 12 h double dose regimen of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception.
    Ngai SW; Fan S; Li S; Cheng L; Ding J; Jing X; Ng EH; Ho PC
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Jan; 20(1):307-11. PubMed ID: 15567882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective randomized comparison of levonorgestrel with the Yuzpe regimen in post-coital contraception.
    Ho PC; Kwan MS
    Hum Reprod; 1993 Mar; 8(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 8473453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post coital contraception.
    Haspels AA; Van Santen MR
    J Gynaecol Endocrinol; 1986; 2(1-2):17-24. PubMed ID: 12269214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.