BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20329837)

  • 1. Speech enhancement using an equivalent source inverse filtering-based microphone array.
    Bai MR; Hur KN; Liu YT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1373-80. PubMed ID: 20329837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal design of minimum mean-square error noise reduction algorithms using the simulated annealing technique.
    Bai MR; Hsieh PJ; Hur KN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):934-43. PubMed ID: 19206870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SVD-based optimal filtering for noise reduction in dual microphone hearing aids: a real time implementation and perceptual evaluation.
    Maj JB; Royackers L; Moonen M; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Sep; 52(9):1563-73. PubMed ID: 16189969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective performance analysis of spherical microphone arrays for speech enhancement in rooms.
    Peled Y; Rafaely B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1473-81. PubMed ID: 22978876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A modified least mean square (LMS) algorithm with variable step-size for an adaptive noise canceller].
    Gao H; Niu CM; Wu W
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2002 Oct; 15(5):366-8. PubMed ID: 12449145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive microphone array for unknown desired speaker's transfer function.
    Papp II; Saric ZM; Jovicic ST; Teslic NDj
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):EL44-9. PubMed ID: 17672528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective and subjective evaluation of adaptive speech enhancement methods for functional MRI.
    Ramachandran VR; Panahi IM; Milani AA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 20027572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():28-38. PubMed ID: 8153562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of adaptive digital signal processing to speech enhancement for the hearing impaired.
    Chabries DM; Christiansen RW; Brey RH; Robinette MS; Harris RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):65-74. PubMed ID: 3430391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1777. PubMed ID: 17927437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids.
    Luts H; Eneman K; Wouters J; Schulte M; Vormann M; Buechler M; Dillier N; Houben R; Dreschler WA; Froehlich M; Puder H; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Leijon A; Lombard A; Mauler D; Spriet A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 20329849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blind single-channel suppression of late reverberation based on perceptual reverberation modeling.
    Tsilfidis A; Mourjopoulos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1439-51. PubMed ID: 21428508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient blind dereverberation and echo cancellation based on independent component analysis for actual acoustic signals.
    Takeda R; Nakadai K; Takahashi T; Komatani K; Ogata T; Okuno HG
    Neural Comput; 2012 Jan; 24(1):234-72. PubMed ID: 22023192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptually motivated wavelet packet transform for bioacoustic signal enhancement.
    Ren Y; Johnson MT; Tao J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):316-27. PubMed ID: 18646979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech enhancement in discontinuous transmission systems using the constrained-stability least-mean-squares algorithm.
    Górriz JM; Ramírez J; Cruces-Alvarez S; Erdogmus D; Puntonet CG; Lang EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3669-83. PubMed ID: 19206795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. TKK Aparat: an environment for voice inverse filtering and parameterization.
    Airas M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2008; 33(1):49-64. PubMed ID: 18344143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monaural sound-source-direction estimation using the acoustic transfer function of a parabolic reflection board.
    Takashima R; Takiguchi T; Ariki Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):902-8. PubMed ID: 20136213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.